Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020293›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2023

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.

Zixiong Li, Yanping Xu, Wenshu Qu, Ping Liu, Yan Zhu, Hui Li, Ying Guo, Xiufeng Liu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zixiong LiDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Yanping XuDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Wenshu QuDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Ping LiuDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Yan ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Hui LiDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Ying GuoDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Xiufeng LiuDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, P.R. China.
Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command · CNNanjing University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often applied to patients who are not suitable or are unwilling to undergo surgical treatment. However, to the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in HCC have not been fully demonstrated. Published studies involving the treatment of patients with HCC with HAIC, ICIs and TKIs were searched from public databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Sinomed. Efficacy and safety data for each study, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The present study included 17 treatment groups from 15 studies, including 1,987 patients with HCC in the systematic review. The target population was dominated by those unsuitable for surgical treatment, with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 and Child-Pugh score A or B. The results showed that the longest estimated median PFS (95% CI) in the HAIC + ICI/TKI therapy group (group C) was 9.37 months (95% CI, 6.81-11.93); in the HAIC therapy group (group B) was 7.45 months (95% CI, 6.45-8.46); and in the ICIs + other systemic therapies group (group A) was 5.92 months (95% CI, 5.31-6.54). There was no significant difference in the expected OS among the three groups, which may be because OS events were not reached in numerous studies during the follow-up time. The incidence of treatment-related adverse effects, such as increased AST [14/221 (6.33%)], increased ALT [13/221 (5.88%)], and decreased platelet count [13/221 (5.88%)], was not significantly increased in group C when compared with groups A or B (P>0.05). In conclusion, the effectiveness of HAIC + ICI/TKI for the treatment of advanced HCC was better than that of ICIs + other systemic therapies or HAIC alone. In addition, the incidence of AEs above grade 3 was not significantly higher compared with that in the other treatment groups, and the safety profile was good.

Indexed as

adverse eventshepatic arterial infusion chemotherapyhepatocellular carcinomaimmune checkpoint inhibitorstyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38020293
PMCPMC10655037
OpenAlexW4388021309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.