ArticleDental research journal2023
Root canal morphology of mandibular first molars: Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and the sectioning technique.
Article in Dental research journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative comparison of enamel-dentin and dentin-pulp distances between cone-beam computed tomography and histological sections: An ex vivo study.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Mandibular First Molar Root and Canal Morphology in Saudi Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A successful endodontic treatment requires a comprehensive knowledge of the root canal morphology. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the sectioning technique for the assessment of mandibular first molar (MFM) root canal morphology. Materials and Methods: In this Results: The diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for the assessment of the MFM root canal morphology was 80% on the mesial surface, 99% in the distal surface, and 96% in total. In the mesial surface, 94.2% of two-canal roots and 66.7% of single-canal roots were correctly detected by CBCT. These values were 100% and 97.4% in the distal surface, and 95.2% and 95.8% in total, respectively. A significant agreement was noted between CBCT and the Gold standard with κ =0.412 for the mesial, 0.939 for the distal, and 0.907 for the total surfaces ( Conclusion: CBCT can be reliably used for the assessment of the complex root canal morphology of MFMs when other modalities fall short.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38020262PMC10630543W4387103051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.