ArticleFrontiers in network physiology2023
What networks in the brain system sustain imagination?
Article in Frontiers in network physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The brain cannot stop elaborating information. While the circuitries implied in processing sensory information, and those involved in programming and producing movements, have been extensively studied and characterized, what circuits elicit and sustain the endogenous activity (which might be referred to as imaginative activity) has not been clarified to a similar extent. The two areas which have been investigated most intensely are visual and motor imagery. Visual imagery mostly involves the same areas as visual processing and has been studied by having the subject face specific visual imagery tasks that are related to the use of the visual sketchpad as a component of the working memory system. Much less is known about spontaneous, free visual imagination, what circuits drive it, how and why. Motor imagery has been studied with several approaches: the neural circuits activated in the brain during performance of a movement have been compared with those involved in visually or kinaesthetically imagining performing the same movement, or in observing another person performing it. Some networks are similarly activated in these situations, although primary motor neurons are only activated during motor execution. Imagining the execution of an action seems unable to activate circuits involved in eliciting accompanying motor adjustments (such as postural adaptations) that are unconsciously (implicitly) associated to the execution of the movement. A more faithful neuronal activation is obtained through kinaesthetic motor imagination-imagining how it feels to perform the movement. Activation of sensory-motor and mirror systems, elicited by observing another person performing a transitive action, can also recruit circuits that sustain implicit motor responses that normally accompany the overt movement. This last aspect has originated the expanding and promising field of action observation therapy (AOT). The fact that the various kinds of motor imagery differentially involve the various brain networks may offer some hints on what neural networks sustain imagery in general, another activity that has an attentive component-recalling a memory, covertly rehearsing a speech, internally replaying a behaviour-and a vague, implicit component that arises from the freely flowing surfacing of internal images, not driven by intentional, conscious control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.