Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020116›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Opioid-free anesthesia reduces the severity of acute postoperative motion-induced pain and patient-controlled epidural analgesia-related adverse events in lung surgery: randomized clinical trial.

Shuwei Wang, Yi Li, Chao Liang, Xiaodan Han, Jiaxing Wang, Changhong Miao

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05063396 (The Efficacy and Safety of Opioid-free Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05063396 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Efficacy and Safety of Opioid-free Anesthesia(OFA) for Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Resection and Its Underlying Clinical Value: a Prospective Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2021 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsThoracic CancerArmsopioid free anesthesia, Opioid-sparing anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shuwei WangDepartment of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chao LiangDepartment of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaodan HanDepartment of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiaxing WangDepartment of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Changhong MiaoDepartment of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNFudan University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Opioids have been used as pain relievers for thousands of years. However, they may also cause undesirable side effects. We therefore performed this study to compare the effect of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) versus opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) on postoperative pain and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA)-related events. Methods: This is a single center randomized clinical trial that was recruited patients aged from 18 to 70 years who received video-assisted lung surgery between October 2021 and February 2022. Participants were 1:1 randomly assigned to OFA or OSA. Patients in the OFA group received propofol, rocuronium, esmolol, lidocaine, and magnesium sulfate intravenously with epidural ropivacaine. Patients in the OSA group received propofol, rocuronium, remifentanil, and sufentanil intravenously with epidural hydromorphone and ropivacaine. Results: A total number of 124 patients were randomly allocated to the OFA or OSA group. In the OFA group, the severity of pain during coughs on the first postoperative days (PODs; VAS score 1.88 ± 0.88 vs. 2.16 ± 1.1, Conclusion: OFA in patients who received video-assisted lung surgery led to lower severity of acute postoperative motion-induced pain and fewer PCEA-related adverse events on the first POD than in the patients in the OSA group. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier (NCT05063396).

Indexed as

acute postoperative painopioid-free anesthesiaopioid-sparing anesthesiaPCEA-related adverse eventvideo-assisted lung surgery

Identifiers

PMID38020116
PMCPMC10657851
OpenAlexW4388421143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.