Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Factors influencing the occurrence of ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the emergency department - a single-center cross-sectional study.

Leo Benning, Jan Kleinekort, Michael Clemens Röttger, Nora Köhne, Julius Wehrle, Marco Blum, Hans-Jörg Busch, Felix Patricius Hans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leo BenningUniversity Emergency Department, University Medical Center Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jan KleinekortUniversity Emergency Department, University Medical Center Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Michael Clemens RöttgerUniversity Emergency Department, University Medical Center Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Nora KöhneUniversity Emergency Department, University Medical Center Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Julius WehrleData Integration Center, University Medical Center Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Marco BlumData Integration Center, University Medical Center Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Hans-Jörg BuschUniversity Emergency Department, University Medical Center Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Felix Patricius HansUniversity Emergency Department, University Medical Center Freiburg, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and importance: The differentiation between patients who require urgent care and those who could receive adequate care through ambulatory services remains a challenge in managing patient volumes in emergency departments (ED). Different approaches were pursued to characterize patients that could safely divert to ambulatory care. However, this characterization remains challenging as the urgency upon presentation is assessed based on immediately available characteristics of the patients rather than on subsequent diagnoses. This work employs a core set of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (core-ACSCs) in an ED to describe conditions that do not require inpatient care if treated adequately in the ambulatory care sector. It subsequently analyzes the corresponding triage levels and admission status to determine whether core-ACSCs relevantly contribute to patient volumes in an ED. Settings and participants: Single center cross-sectional analysis of routine data of a tertiary ED in 2019. Outcome measures and analysis: The proportion of core-ACSCs among all presentations was assessed. Triage levels were binarily classified as "urgent" and "non-urgent," and the distribution of core-ACSCs in both categories was studied. Additionally, the patients presenting with core-ACSCs requiring inpatient care were assessed based on adjusted residuals and logistic regression. The proportion being discharged home underwent further investigation. Main results: This study analyzed 43,382 cases of which 10.79% ( Discussion: Core-ACSCs contribute relevantly to overall ED patient volume but cannot be considered the primary drivers of crowding. However, once patients presented to the ED with what was later confirmed as a core-ACSC, they required urgent care in 65.2%. This finding highlights the importance of effective ambulatory care to avoid emergency presentations. Additionally, the core-ACSC categories "back pain" and "soft tissue disorders" were often found to be non-urgent and discharged home. Although further research is required, these core-ACSCs could be considered potentially avoidable ED presentations. Clinical trial registration: The study was registered in the German trials register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00029751) on 2022-07-22.

Indexed as

ambulatory care sensitive conditionsemergency medicinehealth policyhealth services accessibilityquality of healthcareroutinely collected health data

Identifiers

PMID38020113
PMCPMC10665907
OpenAlexW4388615770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.