ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Improving the filtering of false positive single nucleotide variations by combining genomic features with quality metrics.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-depth whole genome sequencing of blood culture plates reveals evolutionary dynamics in cases of persistent bacteremia due to methicillin-resistantbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Enhancing Clinical Applications by Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity in Whole Exome Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationTechnical errors in sequencing or bioinformatics steps and difficulties in alignment at some genomic sites result in false positive (FP) variants. Filtering based on quality metrics is a common method for detecting FP variants, but setting thresholds to reduce FP rates may reduce the number of true positive variants by overlooking the more complex relationships between features. The goal of this study is to develop a machine learning-based model for identifying FPs that integrates quality metrics with genomic features and with the feature interpretability property to provide insights into model results.
resultsWe propose a random forest-based model that utilizes genomic features to improve identification of FPs. Further examination of the features shows that the newly introduced features have an important impact on the prediction of variants misclassified by VEF, GATK-CNN, and GARFIELD, recently introduced FP detection systems. We applied cost-sensitive training to avoid errors in misclassification of true variants and developed a model that provides a robust mechanism against misclassification of true variants while increasing the prediction rate of FP variants. This model can be easily re-trained when factors such as experimental protocols might alter the FP distribution. In addition, it has an interpretability mechanism that allows users to understand the impact of features on the model's predictions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software implementation can be found at https://github.com/ideateknoloji/FPDetect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.