ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023
Beyond spiking networks: The computational advantages of dendritic amplification and input segregation.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spiking world model with multicompartment neurons for model-based reinforcement learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Context-Sensitive Conscious Interpretation and Layer-5 Pyramidal Neurons in Multistable Perception.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- Defects of Cortical Microcircuits Following Early Exposure to Alcohol.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Simplified two-compartment neuron with calcium dynamics capturing brain-state specific apical-amplification, -isolation and -drive.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Cellular mechanisms of cooperative context-sensitive predictive inference.Current research in neurobiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The brain can efficiently learn a wide range of tasks, motivating the search for biologically inspired learning rules for improving current artificial intelligence technology. Most biological models are composed of point neurons and cannot achieve state-of-the-art performance in machine learning. Recent works have proposed that input segregation (neurons receive sensory information and higher-order feedback in segregated compartments), and nonlinear dendritic computation would support error backpropagation in biological neurons. However, these approaches require propagating errors with a fine spatiotemporal structure to all the neurons, which is unlikely to be feasible in a biological network. To relax this assumption, we suggest that bursts and dendritic input segregation provide a natural support for target-based learning, which propagates targets rather than errors. A coincidence mechanism between the basal and the apical compartments allows for generating high-frequency bursts of spikes. This architecture supports a burst-dependent learning rule, based on the comparison between the target bursting activity triggered by the teaching signal and the one caused by the recurrent connections, providing support for target-based learning. We show that this framework can be used to efficiently solve spatiotemporal tasks, such as context-dependent store and recall of three-dimensional trajectories, and navigation tasks. Finally, we suggest that this neuronal architecture naturally allows for orchestrating "hierarchical imitation learning", enabling the decomposition of challenging long-horizon decision-making tasks into simpler subtasks. We show a possible implementation of this in a two-level network, where the high network produces the contextual signal for the low network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.