Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38019705›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2023

Transmissibility of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 among household contacts of coronavirus disease 2019-positive patients: A community-based study in India.

Aswathy Sreedevi, Ahmad Mohammad, Mini Satheesh, Anuja Ushakumari, Anil Kumar, Geetha Raveendran, Saritha Narayankutty, Soumya Gopakumar, Anisur Rahman, Sachin David and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aswathy SreedeviAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences Kochi India.ORCID 0000-0002-6037-9265
Ahmad MohammadWHO Country Office New Delhi India.
Mini SatheeshGovernment Medical College Thiruvananthapuram India.
Anuja UshakumariGovernment Medical College Kollam India.
Anil KumarAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences Kochi India.
Geetha RaveendranGovernment Medical College Kollam India.
Saritha NarayankuttyGovernment Medical College Thiruvananthapuram India.
Soumya GopakumarGovernment Medical College Thiruvananthapuram India.
Anisur RahmanWHO Country Office New Delhi India.
Sachin DavidAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences Kochi India.
Minu Maria MathewAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences Kochi India.
Prem NairAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences Kochi India.
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre · INGovernment Medical College · INWorld Health Organization - India · IN

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study identified the risk factors for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection among household contacts of index patients and determined the incubation period (IP), serial interval, and estimates of secondary infection rate in Kerala, India.

methodsWe conducted a cohort study in three districts of Kerala among the inhabitants of households of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction-positive coronavirus disease 2019 patients between January and July 2021. About 147 index patients and 362 household contacts were followed up for 28 days to determine reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction positivity and the presence of total antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 on days 1, 7, 14, and 28.

resultsThe mean IP, serial interval, and generation time were 1.6, 3, and 3.9 days, respectively. The secondary infection rate at 14 days was 43.0%. According to multivariable regression analysis persons who worked outside the home were protected (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.85), whereas those who had kissed the coronavirus disease 2019-positive patients during illness were more than twice at risk of infection (aOR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.01-5.2) than those who had not kissed the patients. Sharing a toilet with the index patient increased the risk by more than twice (aOR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.42-4.64) than not sharing a toilet. However, the contacts who reported using masks (aOR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.4) were at a higher risk of infection in household settings.

conclusionsHousehold settings have a high secondary infection rate and the changing transmissibility dynamics such as IP, serial interval should be considered in the prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

CoinfectionCOVID-19Cohort StudiesHumansIndiaSARS-CoV-2generation timehousehold contactssecondary infection rateserial intervalsevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2transmission

Identifiers

PMID38019705
PMCPMC10655783
OpenAlexW4388783478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.