ArticleHealth care management review
Voice is not enough: A multilevel model of how frontline voice can reach implementation.
Article in Health care management review. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frontline providers' perspectives on ageing in place: negotiating older adults' self-responsibility, preventive services and community support.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Bottom-up perspectives on hospital-wide patient flow - a multi-site qualitative study of solutions to organisational paradoxes.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Safety Listening in High-Risk Situations: A Qualitative Analysis of Responses to Safety Voice in Aviation.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- Orchestrating care for a good life event: a hermeneutic study of the overlooked practices of rural perinatal nurses.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Reconceptualizing the balanced scorecard as a communication mechanism in healthcare.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Behind the Frontlines: Insights for Supporting Mental Health and Staff Retention in the Long-Term Care Workforce.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Engaging Interdisciplinary Innovation Teams in Federally Qualified Health Centers.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2024Article
- Speaking Up and Taking Action: Psychological Safety and Joint Problem-Solving Orientation in Safety Improvement.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
issueWhen frontline employees' voice is not heard and their ideas are not implemented, patient care is negatively impacted, and frontline employees are more likely to experience burnout and less likely to engage in subsequent change efforts. CRITICAL THEORETICAL ANALYSIS: Theory about what happens to voiced ideas during the critical stage after employees voice and before performance outcomes are measured is nascent. We draw on research from organizational behavior, human resource management, and health care management to develop a multilevel model encompassing practices and processes at the individual, team, managerial, and organizational levels that, together, provide a nuanced picture of how voiced ideas reach implementation. INSIGHT/ADVANCE: We offer a multilevel understanding of the practices and processes through which voice leads to implementation; illuminate the importance of thinking temporally about voice to better understand the complex dynamics required for voiced ideas to reach implementation; and highlight factors that help ideas reach implementation, including voicers' personal and interpersonal tactics with colleagues and managers, as well as senior leaders modeling and explaining norms and making voice-related processes and practices transparent. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our model provides evidence-based strategies for bolstering rejected or ignored ideas, including how voicers (re)articulate ideas, whom they enlist to advance ideas, how they engage peers and managers to improve conditions for intentional experimentation, and how they take advantage of listening structures and other formal mechanisms for voice. Our model also highlights how senior leaders can make change processes and priorities explicit and transparent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.