ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2024
Developing a Natural History Model for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Economic Burden of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Pooled it
- Descriptive characterization of ambulatory health states in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Motor function trajectories and times to loss of ambulation.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Meeting report: Translating exercise research in dystrophinopathy to the clinic.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Estimating health-state utility values for family-caregivers of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy using time trade-off valuation.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Systematic Literature Reviews of Health-State Utility Values, Costs, and Healthcare Resource Use in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- A natural history study of Chinese individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Results from 2 years of follow-up and beyond.PloS one · 2026Observational
- Bridging science and hope: the evolving story of gene therapy for neuromuscular diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Epidemiology, disease burden and costs of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in Germany: an observational, retrospective health claims data analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Observational
- Incorporation of Patient and Public Involvement in Statistical Methodology Research: Summary of Workshop Proceedings.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Burden of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in Australia: a scoping review.BMJ neurology open · 2025Article
- Characterization of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy across previously developed health states.PloS one · 2024Article
- Natural history of Duchenne muscular dystrophy in the United Kingdom: A descriptive study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Evaluating the Impact of Different Natural History Modeling Methods on Cost-Effectiveness Decisions: A Case Study in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to pool multiple data sets to build a patient-centric, data-informed, natural history model (NHM) for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) to estimate disease trajectory across patient lifetime under current standard of care in future economic evaluations. The study was conducted as part of Project HERCULES, a multi-stakeholder collaboration to develop tools to support health technology assessments of new treatments for DMD.
methodsHealth states were informed by a review of NHMs for DMD and input from clinicians, patients and caregivers, and defined using common outcomes in clinical trials and real-world practice. The primary source informing the NHM was the Critical Path Institute Duchenne Regulatory Science Consortium (D-RSC) database. This was supplemented with expert input obtained via an elicitation exercise, and a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of mortality data.
resultsThe NHM includes ambulatory, transfer and non-ambulatory phases, which capture loss of ambulation, ability to weight bear and upper body and respiratory function, respectively. The NHM estimates patients spend approximately 9.5 years in ambulatory states, 1.5 years in the transfer state and the remainder of their lives in non-ambulatory states. Median predicted survival is 34.8 years (95% CI 34.1-35.8).
conclusionThe model includes a detailed disease pathway for DMD, including the clinically and economically important transfer state. The NHM may be used to estimate the current trajectory of DMD in economic evaluations of new treatments, facilitating inclusion of a lifetime time horizon, and will help identify areas for further research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.