Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38019364›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2024

Differential impact of glomerular and tubule-interstitial histological changes on kidney outcome between non-proteinuric and proteinuric diabetic nephropathy.

Fumihiro Fukata, Masahiro Eriguchi, Hiroyuki Tamaki, Takayuki Uemura, Hikari Tasaki, Riri Furuyama, Masatoshi Nishimoto, Takaaki Kosugi, Kaori Tanabe, Katsuhiko Morimoto and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fumihiro FukataDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Masahiro EriguchiDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan. meriguci@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-7314
Hiroyuki TamakiDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Takayuki UemuraDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Hikari TasakiDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Riri FuruyamaDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Masatoshi NishimotoDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Takaaki KosugiDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Kaori TanabeDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Katsuhiko MorimotoDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Prefecture Seiwa Medical Center, Nara, Japan.
Keisuke OkamotoDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Masaru MatsuiDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan.
Ken-Ichi SamejimaDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Kazuhiko TsuruyaDepartment of Nephrology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara, 634-8521, Japan.
Nara Medical University · JPNara Prefecture General Medical Center

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 18K15984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies on kidney function and histological findings in diabetic nephropathy (DN) with low urinary protein (UP) are few. We examined the differential impact of histological changes on kidney outcomes between non-proteinuric and proteinuric DN.

methodsPatients diagnosed with DN by renal biopsy during 1981-2014 were divided into non-proteinuric (UP ≤ 0.5 g/day) and proteinuric (UP > 0.5 g/day) DN. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the association of glomerular lesions (GLs) and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) development after adjusting for relevant confounders.

resultsThe non-proteinuric and proteinuric DN groups included 197 and 199 patients, respectively. During the 10.7-year median follow-up period, 16 and 83 patients developed ESKD in the non-proteinuric and proteinuric DN groups, respectively. In the multivariable Cox hazard model, hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] of GL and IFTA for ESKD in proteinuric DN were 2.94 [1.67-5.36] and 3.82 [2.06-7.53], respectively. Meanwhile, HRs [95% CIs] of GL and IFTA in non-proteinuric DN were < 0.01 [0-2.48] and 4.98 [1.33-18.0], respectively. IFTA was consistently associated with higher incidences of ESKD regardless of proteinuria levels (P for interaction = 0.49). The prognostic impact of GLs on ESKD was significantly decreased as proteinuria levels decreased (P for interaction < 0.01).

conclusionsIFTA is consistently a useful predictor of kidney prognosis in both non-proteinuric and proteinuric DN, while GLs are a significant predictor of kidney prognosis only in proteinuric DN.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesKidney Failure, ChronicUrinary TractHumansKidneyKidney GlomerulusProteinuriaRetrospective StudiesDiabetic nephropathyGlomerular lesionInterstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophyKidney outcome

Identifiers

PMID38019364
OpenAlexW4389144921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.