Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38019285›Full record

Observational studyClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2024

β-blockers may be detrimental in frail patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Shungo Hikoso, Hirota Kida, Akihiro Sunaga, Daisaku Nakatani, Katsuki Okada, Tomoharu Dohi, Yohei Sotomi, Bolrathanak Oeun, Taiki Sato, Yuki Matsuoka and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shungo HikosoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan. shungo.hikoso.med@osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2284-1970
Hirota KidaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Akihiro SunagaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Daisaku NakataniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Katsuki OkadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Tomoharu DohiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Yohei SotomiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Bolrathanak OeunDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Taiki SatoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Yuki MatsuokaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Tetsuhisa KitamuraDepartment of Social and Environmental Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Tomomi YamadaDepartment of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Hiroyuki KurakamiDepartment of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Shunsuke TamakiDepartment of Cardiology, Rinku General Medical Center, 2-23 Ourai-kita, Rinku, Izumisano, Osaka, 598-8577, Japan.
Masahiro SeoDivision of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, 3-1-56 Bandaihigashi, Osaka, 558-8558, Japan.
Masamichi YanoDivision of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 3-1179 Nagasonecho, Kita-ku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Takaharu HayashiCardiovascular Division, Osaka Police Hospital, 10-31 Kitayamacho, Tennojiku, Osaka, 543-0035, Japan.
Akito NakagawaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
Yusuke NakagawaDivision of Cardiology, Kawanishi City Medical Center, 1-4-1 Hiuchi, Kawanishi, 666-0017, Japan.
Takahisa YamadaDivision of Cardiology, Osaka General Medical Center, 3-1-56 Bandaihigashi, Osaka, 558-8558, Japan.
Yoshio YasumuraDivision of Cardiology, Amagasaki Chuo Hospital, 1-12-1 Shioe, Amagasaki, Hyogo, 661-0976, Japan.
Yasushi SakataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan.
OCVC-Heart Failure investigators
The University of Osaka · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPOsaka Rosai Hospital · JPToyo Institute of Food Technology · JPOsaka Police Hospital · JPOsaka University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of β-blocker in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains to be determined. We aimed to clarify the association between the use of β-blocker and prognosis according to the status of frailty.

methodsWe compared prognosis between HFpEF patients with and without β-blockers stratified with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), using data from the PURSUIT-HFpEF registry (UMIN000021831).

resultsAmong 1159 patients enrolled in the analysis (median age, 81.4 years; male, 44.7%), 580 patients were CFS ≤ 3, while 579 were CFS ≥ 4. Use of β-blockers was associated with a worse composite endpoint of all-cause death and heart failure readmission in patients with CFS ≥ 4 (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.43, 95% CI 1.10-1.85, p = 0.007), but was not significantly associated with this endpoint in those with CFS ≤ 3 (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.71-1.26, p = 0.719) in multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. These results were confirmed in a propensity-matched analysis (HR in those with CFS ≥ 4: 1.42, 95% CI 1.05-1.90, p = 0.020; that in those with CFS ≤ 3: 0.83, 95% CI 0.60-1.14, p = 0.249), and in an analysis in which patients were divided into CFS ≤ 4 and CFS ≥ 5.

conclusionsUse of β-blockers was significantly associated with worse prognosis specifically in patients with HFpEF and high CFS, but not in those with low CFS. Use of β-blockers in HFpEF patients with frailty may need careful attention.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsFrail ElderlyHeart FailureRegistriesStroke VolumeAgedAged, 80 and overCause of DeathFemaleFrailtyHumansJapanMalePrognosisRisk FactorsVentricular Function, LeftAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsClinical Frailty ScaleFrailtyHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionβ-blocker

Identifiers

PMID38019285
OpenAlexW4389148615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.