Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38019280›Full record

Observational studyArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Evaluation of long-term efficacy and safety of dienogest in patients with chronic cyclic pelvic pain associated with endometriosis.

Antonio Maiorana, Marianna Maranto, Vincenzo Restivo, Daniele Lo Gerfo, Gabriella Minneci, Antonella Mercurio, Domenico Incandela

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio MaioranaHCU Obstetrics and Gynecology, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina-Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
Marianna MarantoHCU Obstetrics and Gynecology, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina-Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9159-2691
Vincenzo RestivoDepartment of Medicine, University Kore of Enna, Enna, Italy. vincenzo.restivo@unipa.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5406-884X
Daniele Lo GerfoG.F. Ingrassia Hospital, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-2693-0263
Gabriella MinneciHCU Obstetrics and Gynecology, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina-Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
Antonella MercurioHCU Obstetrics and Gynecology, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina-Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
Domenico IncandelaHCU Obstetrics and Gynecology, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina-Benfratelli Hospital, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9372-5200
Azienda di Rilievo Nazionale ed Alta Specializzazione · ITOspedale G.F. Ingrassia · ITUniversità degli Studi di Enna Kore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety (up to 108 months) of treatment with Dienogest in patients with endometriosis.

methodsPatients with chronic pelvic pain endometriosis-related were enrolled in this observational study from June 2012 to July 2021. The patients enrolled took Dienogest 2 mg as a single daily administration. Group B of long-term therapy patients (over 15 months) were compared with group A of short-term therapy patients (0-15 months). The effects of the drug on pain variation were assessed using the VAS scale and endometriomas dimensions through ultrasonographic evaluation. Furthermore, has been valuated the appearance of side effects and the effect of the drug on bone metabolism by performing MOC every 24 months in group B.

results157 patients were enrolled. The mean size of the major endometrioma progressively decreased from 33.2 mm (29.4-36.9) at T0 to 7 mm (0-15.8) after 108 months of treatment. We found a significant improvement in dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia and non-cyclic pelvic pain. As for the side effects, both groups complained menstrual alterations present in 22.9%. In 27.6% of group B, osteopenia was found. Group B had a higher percentage statistically significant of side effects such as headaches, weight gain and libido reduction compared to group A. 2

conclusionLong-term therapy with Dienogest has proven effective in controlling the symptoms of the disease and reducing the size of endometriomas, with an increase in the positive effects related to the duration of the intake and in the absence of serious adverse events. Study approved by the "Palermo 2" Ethics Committee on July 2, 2012 No. 16.

Indexed as

Chronic PainEndometriosisNandroloneDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansPelvic PainTreatment OutcomedienogestNandroloneCyclic pelvic painDyscheziaDysmenorrheaDyspareuniaEndometrioma

Identifiers

PMID38019280
PMCPMC10808538
OpenAlexW4389143483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.