ArticleDysphagia2024
Effects of Bolus Types and Swallowing Maneuvers on Laryngeal Elevation: Analysis of Healthy Young Adult Men and Healthy Older Men.
Article in Dysphagia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing Submental Neuromuscular Activity of Swallowing Rehabilitation: An Electromyographic Evaluation of Rehabilitative Maneuvers in Healthy Adults.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Trial
- Acoustic and Perceptual Profiles of Swallowing Sounds in Preterm Neonates: A Cross-Sectional Study Cohort.Dysphagia · 2025Article
- Validity and Reliability of a Noninvasive Device for Measuring Laryngeal Movement During Swallowing.Cureus · 2025Article
- Effect of Tongue-Hold Swallow on Laryngeal Elevation During Swallowing in Healthy Older Men.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Peak velocity, distance, and time of laryngeal elevation during swallowing were measured with a laryngeal motion measurement system in eight healthy young adult men in their 20 and 30 s (33.0 ± 4.3 years) and ten healthy older men in their 60 and 70 s (74.0 ± 3.9 years). The participants performed swallowing five times each for a total of eight conditions: two bolus types (saliva and water) and four swallowing methods (normal swallow, effortful swallow, super-supraglottic swallow, and Mendelsohn maneuver). When the bolus type was saliva, peak velocity and distance increased more for swallowing maneuvers (effortful swallow, super-supraglottic swallow, and Mendelsohn maneuver) than for normal swallow. On the other hand, when the bolus type was water, there was no difference in peak velocity or distance between normal swallow and swallowing maneuvers. In healthy older men, distance was greater with Mendelsohn maneuver than with normal swallow, and peak velocity was increased with swallowing maneuvers than with normal swallow. Healthy young adult men had increased peak velocity and distance with water rather than saliva. The increase in peak velocity and distance obtained by swallowing maneuvers was influenced by age and bolus, suggesting that the subjects and conditions used are important in terms of promoting safer oral intake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.