Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38019093›Full record

ArticleRadiation research2024

Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of 16,16 dimethyl Prostaglandin E2 in Non-Irradiated and Irradiated Mice and Non-Irradiated Non-Human Primates.

Brooke Langevin, Pratibha Singh, P Artur Plett, Carol H Sampson, Andi Masters, Allison Gibbs, Eduardo De Faria, Sarah Triesler, Andrew Zodda, Isabel L Jackson and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Brooke LangevinCenter for Translational Medicine, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Pratibha SinghDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202.
P Artur PlettDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202.
Carol H SampsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202.
Andi MastersClinical Pharmacology Analytical Core, Indiana University School of Medicine, IU Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202.
Allison GibbsDivision of Translational Radiation Sciences, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Eduardo De FariaDivision of Translational Radiation Sciences, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Sarah TrieslerDivision of Translational Radiation Sciences, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Andrew ZoddaDivision of Translational Radiation Sciences, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Isabel L JacksonDivision of Translational Radiation Sciences, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Christie M OrschellDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202.
Mathangi GopalakrishnanCenter for Translational Medicine, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Louis M PelusDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University Health · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis ProgramP30CA082709 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Sara K Quinney · 1999 to 2026
$59.3M
Preclinical Evaluation of Radioprotectin-1 for Mitigation of GI-ARSU19AI150574 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JACKSON, ISABEL LAUREN · 2020 to 2024
$13.0M
Project-005U54DK106846 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Reuben Kapur, Karen Elizabeth Pollok · 2015 to 2026
$9.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082709NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI150574NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK106846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to high-dose ionizing radiation can lead to life-threatening injuries and mortality. Bone marrow is the most sensitive organ to radiation damage, resulting in the hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS) with the potential sequelae of infection, hemorrhage, anemia, and death if untreated. The development of medical countermeasures (MCMs) to protect or mitigate radiation injury is a medical necessity. In our well-established murine model of H-ARS we have demonstrated that the prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) analog 16,16 dimethyl-PGE2 (dmPGE2) has survival efficacy as both a radioprotectant and radiomitigator. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and biodistribution of dmPGE2 when used as a radioprotector in irradiated and non-irradiated inbred C57BL/6J mice, PK in irradiated and non-irradiated Jackson Diversity Outbred (JDO) mice, and the PK profile of dmPGE2 in non-irradiated non-human primates (NHPs). The C57BL/6J and JDO mice each received a single subcutaneous (SC) dose of 35 ug of dmPGE2 and were randomized to either receive radiation 30 min later or remain non-irradiated. Plasma and tissue PK profiles were established. The NHP were dosed with 0.1 mg/kg by SC administration and the PK profile in plasma was established. The concentration time profiles were analyzed by standard non-compartmental analysis and the metrics of AUC0-Inf, AUC60-480 (AUC from 60-480 min), Cmax, and t1/2 were evaluated. AUC60-480 represents the postirradiation time frame and was used to assess radiation effect. Overall, AUC0-Inf, Cmax, and t1/2 were numerically similar between strains (C57BL/6J and JDO) when combined, regardless of exposure status (AUC0-Inf: 112.50 ng·h/ml and 114.48 ng·h/ml, Cmax: 44.53 ng/ml and 63.96 ng/ml; t1/2: 1.8 h and 1.1 h, respectively). PK metrics were numerically lower in irradiated C57BL/6J mice than in non-irradiated mice [irradiation ratio: irradiated values/non-irradiated values = 0.71 for AUC60-480 (i.e., 29% lower), and 0.6 for t1/2]. In JDO mice, the radiation ratio was 0.53 for AUC60-480 (i.e., 47% lower), and 1.7 h for t1/2. The AUC0-Inf, Cmax, and t1/2 of the NHPs were 29.20 ng·h/ml, 7.68 ng/ml, and 3.26 h, respectively. Despite the numerical differences seen between irradiated and non-irradiated groups in PK parameters, the effect of radiation on PK can be considered minimal based on current data. The biodistribution in C57BL/6J mice showed that dmPGE2 per gram of tissue was highest in the lungs, regardless of exposure status. The radiation ratio for the different tissue AUC60-480 in C57BL/6J mice ranged between 0.5-1.1 (50% lower to 10% higher). Spleen, liver and bone marrow showed close to twice lower exposures after irradiation, whereas heart had a 10% higher exposure. Based on the clearance values from mice and NHP, the estimated allometric scaling coefficient was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.86). While slightly higher than the current literature estimates of 0.75, this scaling coefficient can be considered a reasonable estimate and can be used to scale dmPGE2 dosing from animals to humans for future trials.

Indexed as

Acute Radiation SyndromeDinoprostoneAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPrimatesTissue DistributionDinoprostone

Identifiers

PMID38019093
PMCPMC11163368
OpenAlexW4389136964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.