ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023
Characterization on the oncogenic effect of the missense mutations of p53 via machine learning.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic evaluation of computational tools to predict the effects of mutations on protein-ligand binding affinity in the absence of experimental structures.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Congenital heart disease missense mutations in the TBX5 DNA-binding domain alter thermal stability and DNA-binding affinity.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Causality-aware graph neural networks for functional stratification and phenotype prediction at scale.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- AlzDiscovery: A computational tool to identify Alzheimer's disease-causing missense mutations using protein structure information.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Dysfunctions caused by missense mutations in the tumour suppressor p53 have been extensively shown to be a leading driver of many cancers. Unfortunately, it is time-consuming and labour-intensive to experimentally elucidate the effects of all possible missense variants. Recent works presented a comprehensive dataset and machine learning model to predict the functional outcome of mutations in p53. Despite the well-established dataset and precise predictions, this tool was trained on a complicated model with limited predictions on p53 mutations. In this work, we first used computational biophysical tools to investigate the functional consequences of missense mutations in p53, informing a bias of deleterious mutations with destabilizing effects. Combining these insights with experimental assays, we present two interpretable machine learning models leveraging both experimental assays and in silico biophysical measurements to accurately predict the functional consequences on p53 and validate their robustness on clinical data. Our final model based on nine features obtained comparable predictive performance with the state-of-the-art p53 specific method and outperformed other generalized, widely used predictors. Interpreting our models revealed that information on residue p53 activity, polar atom distances and changes in p53 stability were instrumental in the decisions, consistent with a bias of the properties of deleterious mutations. Our predictions have been computed for all possible missense mutations in p53, offering clinical diagnostic utility, which is crucial for patient monitoring and the development of personalized cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.