Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38018611›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2023

Puerperal women's satisfaction with the obstetric services received: improvement of an assessment instrument.

Lourivaldo Bispo Alves Junior, Cristiane Faiad, Carlos Manoel Lopes Rodrigues, Ângela Ferreira Barros

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lourivaldo Bispo Alves JuniorFundação de Ensino e Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0465-826X
Cristiane FaiadUniversidade de Brasília. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8012-8893
Carlos Manoel Lopes RodriguesCentro de Ensino Unificado de Brasília. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-7110
Ângela Ferreira BarrosFundação de Ensino e Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde. Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0194-4196
Fundação Estadual de Produção e Pesquisa em Saúde · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversity Center of Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto improve an instrument that measures postpartum women's satisfaction with obstetric care.

methodsaction research, developed from a preliminary version of an instrument prepared by nurse-midwives working in public services in the Federal District. The analysis of the results of application of instrument carried out in a pilot test, analysis of evidence of instrument validity, literature review, focus group with the instrument's developers and interview with the target audience were carried out.

resultsfactorial analysis showed three existing factors in the construct. Seven nurses participated, discussing the instrument reformulation, and 20 mothers reported their perceptions about the care received during childbirth, generating five thematic units. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: instrument improvement occurred through item and response scale reconstruction and reorganization, in addition to application of a pre-test with the target population, resulting in an instrument composed of 13 items.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPostpartum PeriodDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansMothersParturitionPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38018611
PMCPMC10680388
OpenAlexW4389073106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.