Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38018610›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de enfermagem2023

Nursing diagnosis proposal "Impaired Peripheral Venous Return": concept formation.

Hanna Priscilla da Silva Medeiros, Jéssica Naiara de Medeiros Araújo, Amanda Barbosa da Silva, Rodrigo Assis Neves Dantas, Camila Takáo Lopes, Allyne Fortes Vitor

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna Priscilla da Silva MedeirosUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0847-4644
Jéssica Naiara de Medeiros AraújoUniversidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte. Caicó, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9115-3285
Amanda Barbosa da SilvaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5410-7060
Rodrigo Assis Neves DantasUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9309-2092
Camila Takáo LopesUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6243-6497
Allyne Fortes VitorUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4672-2303
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto develop a nursing diagnosis proposal focused on venous return.

methodsthis is a concept analysis according to the model proposed by Walker and Avant, which is operationalized through an integrative review. The study was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol recommendations.

resultsthe analysis of the 131 studies allowed identifying attributes, antecedents and consequences. The most common attribute was decreased venous flow. The antecedents most frequently found were structural and/or functional valve deficiency, advanced age and peripheral venous thrombosis. The most common consequences were peripheral edema, venous ulcer and pain in the extremity.

conclusionsthe formulated nursing diagnosis was proposed as part of Domain 4, Activity/rest, in Class 4, Cardiovascular/pulmonary responses, with eight defining characteristics, five related factors, six at-risk populations and four associated conditions.

Indexed as

Concept FormationNursing DiagnosisHumans

Identifiers

PMID38018610
PMCPMC10680394
OpenAlexW4389049330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.