Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38018353›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging

Paramagnetic rim lesions and the central vein sign: Characterizing multiple sclerosis imaging markers.

Margareta A Clarke, Rachael Cheek, Habeeb F Kazimuddin, Bryan Hernandez, Reece Clarke, Colin D McKnight, Joy Derwenskus, James Eaton, Rebecca Irlmeier, Fei Ye and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Updates in Multiple Sclerosis Imaging.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Margareta A ClarkeNeuroimaging Unit, Neuro-immunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5531-796X
Rachael CheekNeuroimaging Unit, Neuro-immunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Habeeb F KazimuddinNeuroimaging Unit, Neuro-immunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Bryan HernandezNeuroimaging Unit, Neuro-immunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Reece ClarkeNeuroimaging Unit, Neuro-immunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Colin D McKnightDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Joy DerwenskusNeuro-immunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
James EatonNeuro-immunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Rebecca IrlmeierDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medica Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Fei YeDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medica Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kristin P O'GradyVanderbilt Medical Scientist Training Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Baxter RogersVanderbilt Medical Scientist Training Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Seth A SmithVanderbilt Medical Scientist Training Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Francesca BagnatoNeuroimaging Unit, Neuro-immunology Division, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USMeharry Medical College · USVA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System · US

Funding

Upgrade and Refurbishment of a 7T MRI Scanner for ResearchS10OD030389 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2021 to 2021
$2.0M
Development of Advanced MRI for the Thoracolumbar Spinal Cord for Clinical ApplicationK01EB030039 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI O'GRADY, KRISTIN POOLE · 2020 to 2023
$622k
NIBIB NIH HHS K01 EB030039NIH HHS S10 OD030389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeParamagnetic rims and the central vein sign (CVS) are proposed imaging markers of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. Using 7 tesla magnetic resonance imaging, we aimed to: (1) characterize the appearance of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs); (2) assess whether PRLs and the CVS are associated with higher levels of MS pathology; and (3) compare the characteristics between subjects with and without PRLs in early MS.

methodsProspective study of 32 treatment-naïve subjects around the time of diagnosis who were assessed for the presence of PRLs and the CVS. Comparisons of lesion volume and macromolecular pool size ratio (PSR) index, a proxy of myelin integrity, between PRLs and non-PRLs, and CVS-positive and CVS-negative lesions were carried out. Differences in clinical/demographic characteristics between patients with PRLs and those without were tested.

resultsFifteen subjects had ≥1 PRL for a total of 36 PRLs, of which two-thirds had a full rim. PRLs predicted a larger lesion size and decreased PSR signal. Lesion volume and presence of cervical spine lesions were significantly different between subjects with PRLs and those without, although neither remained significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. One hundred and eighty-one lesions with CVS were identified with no differences between CVS-positive and CVS-negative lesions in volume (p = .27) and PSR values (p = .62).

conclusionsPRLs, but not CVS-positive lesions, are larger and have lower myelin integrity. Our findings indicate that PRLs are associated with higher levels of lesion-specific pathology prior to the start of disease-modifying therapy.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesVeinscentral vein signmagnetic resonance imagingmultiple sclerosisparamagnetic rim lesionsusceptibility-weighted imaging

Identifiers

PMID38018353
PMCPMC10842224
OpenAlexW4389146126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.