ArticleCurrent radiopharmaceuticals2024
Personalized 125I Seed Interstitial Brachytherapy for Patients Aged 80 Years and Over with Early Primary High-risk Non-melanoma Skin Cancer.
Article in Current radiopharmaceuticals, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of iodine-125 seeds interstitial brachytherapy (PISI-BT) for patients aged 80 and above with early primary high-risk non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC).
methodsIn this retrospective single-center study, we collected and analyzed data from patients ≥ 80 years of age with early primary high-risk NMSC treated with PISI-BT between December 2003 and May 2020. Survival status, efficacy, adverse effects (AEs), cosmetic outcomes, and treatment cost were analyzed (data cut-off: November 20th, 2021).
resultsOnly 9 patients met the inclusion criteria (median age, 86 years (81-90)). Five patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 1, and allthe patients had at least one comorbidity. Six patients showed complete responseand three showed partial response, while none had stable or progressive disease. No recurrences, disease persistence, or AEs were detected during the follow-up period. After a median follow-up of 29.3 months (3-99), only two patients were alive, but the cause of death in the remaining patients was not related to NMSC. The cosmetic outcomes were excellent and good in two and four patients, respectively, while could not be evaluated in three patients. The cost (which was within the scope of medical insurance reimbursement) was acceptable.
conclusionPISI-BT could be an alternative treatment option in patients above 80 years old with early primary high-risk NMSC and comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.