ArticleCurrent cardiology reviews2024
Adherence to Congestive Heart Failure Guidelines and Outcome in the Middle East.
Article in Current cardiology reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdherence to Congestive Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (CHFrEF) guidelines is not easily attainable everywhere, particularly in countries with a high prevalence of low socioeconomic status, which includes many Middle Eastern countries. However, it is well-established that adherence to the guidelines is associated with lower mortality and morbidity rates.
objectiveOur objective is to investigate the adherence to the degree of treatment guideline in CHFrEF within a patient population in the Middle East and correlate the level of compliance both fully and partially with morbidity and mortality outcomes. Methods and Statistics: We conducted a retrospective study on patients with CHFrEF in the Middle East region who were maintained on Sacubitril/Valsartan for up to 4 years (190 patients). This study included follow-up assessments for morbidity and mortality rates and their correlation with the level of adherence to guidelines.
resultsStatistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS® 27th version. In both the partial adherence group and the full adherence group, there was a statistically significant improvement in NYHA (pretreatment and post-treatment) and Ejection fraction (pretreatment and posttreatment). This means that regardless of the level of adherence to the use of Sacubitril/Valsartan in CHFrEF, there was an overall improvement in the morbidity and mortality rates over the four years of follow-up.
conclusionWhile we fully support the idea of achieving full CHFrEF guideline adherence, we recognize the difficulty of this task. Nevertheless, this study reinforces the notion that any degree of adherence to guideline is correlated with better morbidity and mortality rates over a long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.