Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38018109›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Evolutionary ecomorphology for the twenty-first century: examples from mammalian carnivores.

Julia A Schwab, Borja Figueirido, Alberto Martín-Serra, Julien van der Hoek, Therese Flink, Anne Kort, Juan Miguel Esteban Núñez, Katrina E Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Wild canids and felids differ in their reliance on reused travel routeways.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julia A SchwabDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6229-7116
Borja FigueiridoDepartamento de Ecología y Geología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2542-3977
Alberto Martín-SerraDepartamento de Ecología y Geología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0221-1103
Julien van der HoekDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8485-2363
Therese FlinkDepartment of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, 10405 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1982-6326
Anne KortDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, 1001 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Juan Miguel Esteban NúñezDepartamento de Ecología y Geología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2387-1119
Katrina E JonesDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1088-0497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carnivores (cats, dogs and kin) are a diverse group of mammals that inhabit a remarkable range of ecological niches. While the relationship between ecology and morphology has long been of interest in carnivorans, the application of quantitative techniques has resulted in a recent explosion of work in the field. Therefore, they provide a case study of how quantitative techniques, such as geometric morphometrics (GMM), have impacted our ability to tease apart complex ecological signals from skeletal anatomy, and the implications for our understanding of the relationships between form, function and ecological specialization. This review provides a synthesis of current research on carnivoran ecomorphology, with the goal of illustrating the complex interaction between ecology and morphology in the skeleton. We explore the ecomorphological diversity across major carnivoran lineages and anatomical systems. We examine cranial elements (skull, sensory systems) and postcranial elements (limbs, vertebral column) to reveal mosaic patterns of adaptation related to feeding and hunting strategies, locomotion and habitat preference. We highlight the crucial role that new approaches have played in advancing our understanding of carnivoran ecomorphology, while addressing challenges that remain in the field, such as ecological classifications, form-function relationships and multi-element analysis, offering new avenues for future research.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCarnivoraAnimalsDogsLocomotionPhylogenySkullcarnivoraecomorphologygeometric morphometrics

Identifiers

PMID38018109
PMCPMC10685142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.