Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38017663›Full record

Observational studyEpilepsia open2024

PERPRISE: A prospective non-interventional study of PERampanel as only adjunctive treatment in patients with PRImary or SEcondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures: First interim analysis.

Bernhard J Steinhoff, Tobias Goldmann, Edgar Kockelmann, Yaroslav Winter, PERPRISE Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04202159 (PERPRISE), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04202159 completednot on this map

PERPRISE: A Prospective Non-interventional Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Perampanel (Fycompa®) as Only Add-on Treatment in Patients With Primary or Secondarily Generalized Tonic-clonic Seizures

TypeobservationalSponsorEisai GmbHRan2020 to 2023Enrolled187ConditionsSeizuresArmsPerampanel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bernhard J SteinhoffKork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-5862
Tobias GoldmannEisai GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-9144
Edgar KockelmannEisai GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Yaroslav WinterMainz Comprehensive Epilepsy and Sleep Medicine Center, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-4038
PERPRISE Study Group
Eisai (Germany) · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Eisai GmbHEisai Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report the interim results of the PERPRISE study (Study 509; NCT04202159), which is evaluating perampanel as the only adjunctive anti-seizure medication (ASM) in adults with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS).

methodsPERPRISE is an ongoing 12-month multicenter, prospective, observational, non-interventional study of perampanel in a real-world setting in Germany. Patients are aged ≥18 years with FBTCS or GTCS due to focal or idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Perampanel, as an adjunctive therapy to ASM monotherapy ('add-on therapy') or as a substitute for one ASM in dual therapy ('substitution therapy'), is prescribed in line with its SmPC. The Interim Analysis Set comprises the first 100 patients who received ≥1 dose of perampanel and attended or discontinued prior to the ~6-month visit. Interim endpoints include retention rate, measures of effects on seizure frequency, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

resultsOne hundred patients were included in the Interim Analysis Set (add-on, n = 43 [43.0%]; substitution, n = 55 [55.0%]; unknown, n = 2). The 6-month retention rate was 78.0% (add-on, 83.7%; substitution, 72.7%). For the overall population with GTCS and/or FBTCS, seizure-freedom rate at 6 months was 58.8% (add-on, 72.2%; substitution, 47.9%) and 50% responder rate at 6 months was 82.6% (add-on, 89.2%; substitution, 76.6%). Retention rates and seizure outcomes were better with perampanel as an early-line treatment than as a late-line treatment. TEAEs were reported by 48 patients (48.0%), most commonly dizziness (n = 9), fatigue (n = 7), and irritability (n = 7). Sixteen patients (16.0%) withdrew from perampanel treatment due to TEAEs. SIGNIFICANCE: The interim analysis of PERPRISE offers insight into the real-world use of perampanel in Germany, including for the first time, clinical practice data from patients with GTCS and switching ASMs within a dual therapy. Further data from PERPRISE will be of value to inform clinical decision-making in this patient cohort. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients with epilepsy often take more than one medication for seizure control. This 12month study looked at patients in Germany receiving perampanel as only add-on medication. The interim analysis shows, that at 6 months, over 70% of the 100 patients continued to use perampanel; 59% experienced no seizures during treatment with perampanel, and in 83%, seizure frequency was reduced by half. Side effects occurred in 48% of patients (most commonly dizziness, fatigue, and irritability) and caused 16% to withdraw from the study. Overall, perampanel was a suitable as only add-on medication for patients with epilepsy.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsDrug Therapy, CombinationNitrilesPyridonesSeizuresAdolescentAdultAgedEpilepsy, GeneralizedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsNitrilesperampanelPyridonesepilepsyGermanyperampanelreal world

Identifiers

PMID38017663
PMCPMC11145611
OpenAlexW4389150214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.