Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38017587›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2023

Impact of COVID-19 research: a study on predicting influential scholarly documents using machine learning and a domain-independent knowledge graph.

Gollam Rabby, Jennifer D'Souza, Allard Oelen, Lucie Dvorackova, Vojtěch Svátek, Sören Auer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gollam RabbyL3S Research Center, Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Germany. gollam.rabby@l3s.de.
Jennifer D'SouzaLeibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany.
Allard OelenLeibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, Hannover, Germany.
Lucie DvorackovaDepartment of Econometrics, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vojtěch SvátekDepartment of Information and Knowledge Engineering, Prague University of Economics and Business, nám. Winstona Churchilla 1938/4, 120 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Sören AuerL3S Research Center, Leibniz University Hannover, Hanover, Germany.

Funding

European Commission CHIST-ERA-19- XAI-003Vysoká Škola Ekonomická v Praze IGA 16/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple studies have investigated bibliometric features and uncategorized scholarly documents for the influential scholarly document prediction task. In this paper, we describe our work that attempts to go beyond bibliometric metadata to predict influential scholarly documents. Furthermore, this work also examines the influential scholarly document prediction task over categorized scholarly documents. We also introduce a new approach to enhance the document representation method with a domain-independent knowledge graph to find the influential scholarly document using categorized scholarly content. As the input collection, we use the WHO corpus with scholarly documents on the theme of COVID-19. This study examines different document representation methods for machine learning, including TF-IDF, BOW, and embedding-based language models (BERT). The TF-IDF document representation method works better than others. From various machine learning methods tested, logistic regression outperformed the other for scholarly document category classification, and the random forest algorithm obtained the best results for influential scholarly document prediction, with the help of a domain-independent knowledge graph, specifically DBpedia, to enhance the document representation method for predicting influential scholarly documents with categorical scholarly content. In this case, our study combines state-of-the-art machine learning methods with the BOW document representation method. We also enhance the BOW document representation with the direct type (RDF type) and unqualified relation from DBpedia. From this experiment, we did not find any impact of the enhanced document representation for the scholarly document category classification. We found an effect in the influential scholarly document prediction with categorical data.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pattern Recognition, AutomatedAlgorithmsHumansLanguageMachine LearningCOVID-19Domain-independent knowledge graphInfluential scholarly document predictionMachine learning algorithmsText miningWorld health organization

Identifiers

PMID38017587
PMCPMC10683290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.