Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38017530›Full record

ReviewFluids and barriers of the CNS2023

Breaking barriers: exploring mechanisms behind opening the blood-brain barrier.

Melanie E M Stamp, Michael Halwes, David Nisbet, David J Collins

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Reprogramming of pathogenic strategies inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Schottky barrier in pea-like Au@BiMaterials today. Bio · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie E M StampDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. melanie.stamp@unimelb.edu.au.
Michael HalwesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
David NisbetDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
David J CollinsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council ID2003446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a selectively permeable membrane that separates the bloodstream from the brain. While useful for protecting neural tissue from harmful substances, brain-related diseases are difficult to treat due to this barrier, as it also limits the efficacy of drug delivery. To address this, promising new approaches for enhancing drug delivery are based on disrupting the BBB using physical means, including optical/photothermal therapy, electrical stimulation, and acoustic/mechanical stimulation. These physical mechanisms can temporarily and locally open the BBB, allowing drugs and other substances to enter. Focused ultrasound is particularly promising, with the ability to focus energies to targeted, deep-brain regions. In this review, we examine recent advances in physical approaches for temporary BBB disruption, describing their underlying mechanisms as well as evaluating the utility of these physical approaches with regard to their potential risks and limitations. While these methods have demonstrated efficacy in disrupting the BBB, their safety, comparative efficacy, and practicality for clinical use remain an ongoing topic of research.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrain DiseasesBrainDrug Delivery SystemsHumansBBB stimulationBlood–Brain barrierFocused ultrasoundNeurological therapeuticsTight junctions

Identifiers

PMID38017530
PMCPMC10683235
OpenAlexW4389089684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.