ArticleImplementation science communications2023
Study protocol: Novel Methods for Implementing Measurement-Based Care with youth in Low-Resource Environments (NIMBLE).
Article in Implementation science communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05644756 (IMPACT Center Signature Project 1, "Novel Methods for Implementing Measurement-Based Care for Youth in Low-resource Environments", is Embedded Within IMPACT Center P50 Entitled), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
IMPACT Center Signature Project 1, "Novel Methods for Implementing Measurement-Based Care for Youth in Low-resource Environments", is Embedded Within IMPACT Center P50 Entitled: Optimizing Evidence-Based Practice Implementation for Clinical Impact: the IMPACT Center.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-report methods for the assessment of implementation determinants: Reflections on the CFIR user guide.Implementation science : IS · 2026Article
- A Measurement Roadmap to Guide Implementation Practitioners in Selecting Implementation Measures.Global implementation research and applications · 2025Article
- Short Report: Comparison of three methods for identifying implementation determinants to measurement-based care.Research square · 2025Article
- Methods for community-engaged data collection and analysis in implementation research.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- 30 years of youth system of care lessons learned - a qualitative study of Hawai'i's partnership with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- From Creative Engagement to Illustrative Insights: Exploring the Role of Design Probes for Implementation Research.Implementation research and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor youth receiving care in community mental health centers, comorbidities are the rule rather than the exception. Using measurement-based care (MBC), or the routine evaluation of symptoms to inform care decisions, as the foundation of treatment for youth with comorbid problems significantly improves the impact of psychotherapy by focusing care and building engagement and alliance. MBC increases the rate of symptom improvement, detects clients who would otherwise deteriorate, and alerts clinicians to non-responders. Despite its demonstrated utility, MBC is rarely implemented with fidelity; less than 15% of providers report using MBC per recommendations. Previous efforts to support MBC implementation have yielded suboptimal outcomes, in part, due to organizations' challenges with identifying and prioritizing barriers and selecting and developing strategies to overcome them. New methods are needed for identifying and prioritizing barriers, and matching strategies to barriers to optimize MBC implementation and treatment quality to improve youth mental health outcomes in community settings.
methodsPragmatic implementation methods will be piloted in four diverse community mental health centers. Methods include (a) rapid evidence synthesis; (b) rapid ethnography; (c) design kits (e.g., kits with disposable cameras, journals, maps); (d) barrier prioritization, and (e) causal pathway diagramming. These activities will generate actionable barriers; subsequently, we will use facilitated group processes to prioritize barriers and develop causal pathway diagrams to match strategies to barriers to create implementation plans that optimize MBC fidelity (Aim 1). We will track strategy deployment for 6 months, then compare MBC fidelity for another 6 months post-implementation with data from 2 years of historical controls (Aim 2). Finally, we will co-design a toolkit for design kit methods with youth and the practice and scientific communities (Aim 3). DISCUSSION: Optimizing MBC implementation in community mental health centers could transform youth mental health care by ensuring the most pressing symptoms are targeted early in treatment. The discussion section highlights expected challenges and limits to using the five methods, including recruitment and engagement given the high pressure on community mental health settings.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov. NCT05644756 . Registered on 18 November 2022. This trial was retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.