Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38017448›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2023

Cost-effectiveness of finerenone in chronic kidney disease associated with type 2 diabetes in The Netherlands.

Sara W Quist, Alexander V van Schoonhoven, Stephan J L Bakker, Michał Pochopień, Maarten J Postma, Jeanni M T van Loon, Jeroen H J Paulissen

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara W QuistDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. s.w.quist@umcg.nl.
Alexander V van SchoonhovenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Stephan J L BakkerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michał PochopieńAssignity, Kraków, Poland.
Maarten J PostmaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jeanni M T van LoonValue-XS, Houten, The Netherlands.
Jeroen H J PaulissenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the Netherlands, more than one million patients have type 2 diabetes (T2D), and approximately 36% of these patients have chronic kidney disease (CKD). Yearly medical costs related to T2D and CKD account for approximately €1.3 billion and €805 million, respectively. The FIDELIO-DKD trial showed that the addition of finerenone to the standard of care (SoC) lowers the risk of CKD progression and cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with CKD stages 2-4 associated with T2D. This study investigates the cost-effectiveness of adding finerenone to the SoC of patients with advanced CKD and T2D compared to SoC monotherapy.

methodsThe validated FINE-CKD model is a Markov cohort model which simulates the disease pathway of patients over a lifetime time horizon. The model was adapted to reflect the Dutch societal perspective. The model estimated the incremental costs, utilities, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to assess the effect of parameter uncertainty on model robustness.

resultsWhen used in conjunction with SoC, finerenone extended time free of CV events and renal replacement therapy by respectively 0.30 and 0.31 life years compared to SoC alone, resulting in an extension of 0.20 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The reduction in renal and CV events led to a €6136 decrease in total lifetime costs per patient compared to SoC alone, establishing finerenone as a dominant treatment option. Finerenone in addition to SoC had a 83% probability of being dominant and a 93% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000.

conclusionBy reducing the risk of CKD progression and CV events, finerenone saves costs to society while gaining QALYs in patients with T2D and advanced CKD in the Netherlands.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Renal Insufficiency, ChronicCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansNaphthyridinesNetherlandsfinerenoneNaphthyridinesChronic kidney diseaseCost-effectiveness-analysisCostsFinerenoneQALYsType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID38017448
PMCPMC10685667
OpenAlexW4389082249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.