Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38017414›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2023

Deep learning model for measuring the sagittal Cobb angle on cervical spine computed tomography.

Chunjie Wang, Ming Ni, Shuai Tian, Hanqiang Ouyang, Xiaoming Liu, Lianxi Fan, Pei Dong, Liang Jiang, Ning Lang, Huishu Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Development of a deep learning model for measuring sagittal parameters on cervical spine X-ray.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chunjie Wang *Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ming Ni *Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Shuai Tian *Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Hanqiang OuyangDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xiaoming LiuBeijing United Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent Imaging, Beijing, 100089, China.
Lianxi FanUnited Imaging Intelligence (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100089, China.
Pei DongUnited Imaging Intelligence (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100089, China.
Liang JiangDepartment of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ning LangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Huishu YuanDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. huishuy@bjmu.edu.cn.
Peking University Third Hospital · CNPeking University · CNUnited Imaging Healthcare (China) · CN

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7212126Beijing New Health Industry Development Foundation XM2020-02-006National Natural Science Foundation of China 82102638National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171927Peking University Third Hospital Clinical Key Project BYSYZD2021040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesTo develop a deep learning (DL) model to measure the sagittal Cobb angle of the cervical spine on computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo VB-Net-based DL models for cervical vertebra segmentation and key-point detection were developed. Four-points and line-fitting methods were used to calculate the sagittal Cobb angle automatically. The average value of the sagittal Cobb angle was manually measured by two doctors as the reference standard. The percentage of correct key points (PCK), matched samples t test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation coefficient, mean absolute error (MAE), and Bland‒Altman plots were used to evaluate the performance of the DL model and the robustness and generalization of the model on the external test set.

resultsA total of 991 patients were included in the internal data set, and 112 patients were included in the external data set. The PCK of the DL model ranged from 78 to 100% in the test set. The four-points method, line-fitting method, and reference standard measured sagittal Cobb angles were - 1.10 ± 18.29°, 0.30 ± 13.36°, and 0.50 ± 12.83° in the internal test set and 4.55 ± 20.01°, 3.66 ± 18.55°, and 1.83 ± 12.02° in the external test set, respectively. The sagittal Cobb angle calculated by the four-points method and the line-fitting method maintained high consistency with the reference standard (internal test set: ICC = 0.75 and 0.97; r = 0.64 and 0.94; MAE = 5.42° and 3.23°, respectively; external test set: ICC = 0.74 and 0.80, r = 0.66 and 0.974, MAE = 5.25° and 4.68°, respectively).

conclusionsThe DL model can accurately measure the sagittal Cobb angle of the cervical spine on CT. The line-fitting method shows a higher consistency with the doctors and a minor average absolute error.

Indexed as

Deep LearningCervical VertebraeHumansSpineTomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedCervical spineComputed tomographyDeep learningSagittal Cobb angle

Identifiers

PMID38017414
PMCPMC10685593
OpenAlexW4389088758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.