Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38017310›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2024

A Scoping Review of the Use of Robotics Technologies for Supporting Social-Emotional Learning in Children with Autism.

Sarika Kewalramani, Kelly-Ann Allen, Erin Leif, Andrea Ng

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarika KewalramaniDepartment of Education, School of Social Sciences Media Film and Education, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, 3122, Australia. Skewalramani@swin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4937-3364
Kelly-Ann AllenSchool of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6813-0034
Erin LeifSchool of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2219-2405
Andrea NgDepartment of Education, School of Social Sciences Media Film and Education, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, 3122, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9514-778X
Swinburne University of Technology · AUMonash University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Monash University Capacity Building Grant, School of Educational Psychology and Counselling
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review synthesises the current research into robotics technologies for promoting social-emotional learning in children with autism spectrum disorder. It examines the types of robotics technologies employed, their applications, and the gaps in the existing literature. Our scoping review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. The systematic search of relevant databases allowed us to identify studies that use robotics technologies for fostering social, emotional, and cognitive skills in young children with autism. Our review has revealed that various robots, such as Nao, Kaspar, and Zeno, have been used to support the development of social and emotional skills through imitation games, turn-taking, joint attention, emotional recognition, and conversation. As most of these studies were conducted in clinical settings, there is a need for further research in classroom and community-based environments. Additionally, the literature calls for more high-quality longitudinal studies to assess the long-term effectiveness and sustainability of robot-assisted therapy and to assess adaptive and personalised interventions tailored to individual needs. More emphasis is recommended on professional development for educators, parents, and health professionals to incorporate robotics technologies as evidence-based interventions as a pathway for creating inclusive learning environments for children with autism.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderEmotionsRoboticsChildHumansLearningSocial LearningSocial SkillsAutism spectrum disorderChild-robot interactionsInclusive teaching and learningRobot-assisted therapyRobotics technologies

Identifiers

PMID38017310
OpenAlexW4389080561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.