Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38017295›Full record

SynthesisProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2024

Comparison of

Siyu Huang, Sean Ong, Dean McKenzie, Adam Mirabelli, David C Chen, Thilakavathi Chengodu, Declan G Murphy, Michael S Hofman, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Marlon Perera

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Detection rate of [Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PET-based risk stratification for adverse events under [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Head-to-head comparison betweenJournal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Quantitative characterization ofMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Siyu HuangDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. huangsiyu1998@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9488-2726
Sean OngDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Dean McKenzieResearch Development & Governance Unit, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Adam MirabelliDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
David C ChenProstate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Thilakavathi ChengoduEJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Declan G MurphySir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7500-5899
Michael S HofmanProstate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8622-159X
Nathan LawrentschukDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Marlon PereraDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1138-6389
The University of Melbourne · AUProstate Cancer Foundation of Australia · AUEpworth Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has become an increasingly established imaging modality in the staging of prostate cancer (PCa). Numerous PSMA-based tracers are currently available, however, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal radiotracer(s) for PSMA PET/CT. This study aims to investigate whether Fluorine-18 (

methodsA critical review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science databases was performed in May 2023 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Studies that directly compared

resultsTwenty-four studies were analysed. [

conclusions[

Indexed as

Fluorine RadioisotopesGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsAntigens, SurfaceEdetic AcidGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansMaleOligopeptidesAntigens, SurfaceEdetic AcidFluorine-18Fluorine RadioisotopesFOLH1 protein, humangallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIOligopeptidesPSMA-11Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID38017295
PMCPMC11543591
OpenAlexW4389098147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.