Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38017223›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2023

Frequency and severity of malocclusions in patients with statutory health insurance in a German orthodontic practice in North Rhine Westphalia - a multi-part cross-sectional study over a 20-year period.

Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger, Jan Hourfar, Andrijana Maletic, Jörg Alexander Lisson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Age-dependent prevalence of malocclusions requiring treatment according to the KIG classification : A multipart cross-sectional study over a 10-year period from the district of Viersen/North Rhine.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gero Stefan Michael KinzingerDepartment of Orthodontics, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Jan HourfarDepartment of Orthodontics, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8692-4516
Andrijana MaleticDepartment of Orthodontics, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Jörg Alexander LissonDepartment of Orthodontics, Saarland University, Homburg, Saar, Germany. Joerg.lisson@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1602-9540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSince 2002, patients with statutory health insurance in Germany must undergo an assessment of orthodontic treatment need using the "Kieferorthopädische Indikationsguppen" (KIG; orthodontic indication groups) classification system. According to this system, tooth and jaw misalignment are divided into 11 subgroups and five grades. The objectives of this study were to determine the distribution of KIG classifications in patients with statutory insurance of a German orthodontic practice (North Rhine, Germany) and to analyze changes over a 20-year period. MATERIALS AND

methodsSince the introduction of the KIG index in 2002, 4940 statutorily insured patients over a 20-year period (2330 m, 2610 f, min 3.2, max 49.5 years, peak between 10 and 12 years) were classified at their first appointment. According to the valid guidelines of the statutory health insurance (GKV), the division was made into the highest possible KIG classification. Multiple entries were thus not made. In accordance with the operating cycles of the practice, the progression was divided into four 5-year periods.

resultsOver a 20-year period, 24.98% of the patients were assigned to the classification "D". 86.52% of the patients were among the 6 most frequently ("D", "E", "K", "S", "P" and "M", > 10% each) and only 13.49% among the 5 least frequently recorded classifications ("U", "B", "T", "O" and "A", < 5% each).

conclusionThe distribution of the 6 most frequent and the 5 least frequent KIG classifications was constant over a 20-year-period. Among all possible tooth and jaw misalignment variants, the sagittal classifications "D" and "M" represent the most frequent malocclusions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results and their comparison with historical data show that both frequency and severity of tooth and jaw misalignment with orthodontic treatment need appear identical for patients with statutory health insurance over a 20-year period.

Indexed as

MalocclusionCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansInsurance, HealthIndex systemKIG classificationMalocclusionOrthodonticsTreatment need

Identifiers

PMID38017223
PMCPMC10713688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.