Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38017194›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A comparative analysis of compression bearing capacity in recycled concrete brick walls and composite walls incorporating coal-ash blocks.

Jianhua Li, Xueyong Xu, Xiaoqin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianhua LiHuzhou Vocational and Technical College, Huzhou, 313000, China. xjbnljh@126.com.
Xueyong XuHuzhou Vocational and Technical College, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Xiaoqin LiuHuzhou Vocational and Technical College, Huzhou, 313000, China.

Funding

Public welfare research project of Huzhou City 2021GZ19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the face of the problem of waste disposal in the demolition of concrete structures, a composite wall composed of recycled concrete bricks and fly ash blocks was proposed, and based on the previous thermal performance research, its axial compression performance were further studied. Four types of walls were designed and constructed: (1) clay brick masonry (CBM), (2) recycled concrete brick masonry (RBM), (3) bilateral clay bricks masonry with coal-ash blocks sandwich insulation wall (CFCM), and (4) bilateral recycled concrete bricks masonry with coal-ash blocks sandwich insulation wall (RFRM). The test results showed that recycled concrete brick masonry exhibited a higher bearing capacity than clay brick masonry. The ultimate load of RBM was 15% higher than that of CBM. Moreover, the ultimate load of CFCM was 21% higher than that of CBM. Following the addition of sandwich coal-ash blocks in RBM, its ultimate load increased by over 42% than that of CBM. Following the addition of coal-ash blocks sandwich in both clay and recycled concrete bricks masonry, both the bearing capacity and strain exhibited improvement, the yielding load and compressive strength of them increased. Thus, it could be concluded that coal-ash blocks improved its bearing capacity. Based on the analysis of the axial compression tests, a theoretical computational model was developed and a computational expression to explain the compressive bearing capacity of a two-sided brick with coal-ash blocks sandwich insulation wall. Comparisons between the test ultimate loads (FT) and the estimated ultimate loads (FE) confirmed the accuracy of the theoretical calculation model for the compressive bearing capacity. Thus, theoretical computational models are highly recommended for the design of two-sided bricks with insulating walls constructed from coal-ash blocks being sandwiched together. This study provides a theoretical basis for the engineering application of recycled concrete brick wall and fly ash block composite wall.

Identifiers

PMID38017194
PMCPMC10684658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.