Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38017156›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

Predictors of reoperation after lung volume reduction surgery.

Alberte Lund, Patrick Soldath, Erika Nodin, Henrik Jessen Hansen, Michael Perch, Kristine Jensen, Kåre Hornbech, Anna Kalhauge, Jann Mortensen, René Horsleben Petersen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alberte LundDepartment of Cardiothoracic surgery, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. alberte.lund@regionh.dk.ORCID 0009-0007-4024-552X
Patrick SoldathDepartment of Cardiothoracic surgery, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Erika NodinDepartment of Cardiothoracic surgery, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik Jessen HansenDepartment of Cardiothoracic surgery, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael PerchDepartment of Cardiology, Section for Lung Transplantation and Respiratory Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristine JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Section for Lung Transplantation and Respiratory Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kåre HornbechDepartment of Cardiothoracic surgery, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anna KalhaugeDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jann MortensenDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
René Horsleben PetersenDepartment of Cardiothoracic surgery, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has proven an effective treatment for emphysema, by decreasing hyperinflation and improving lung function, activity level and reducing dyspnoea. However, postoperative air leak is an important complication, often leading to reoperation. Our aim was to analyse reoperations after LVRS and identify potential predictors.

methodsConsecutive single-centre unilateral VATS LVRS performed from 2017 to 2022 were included. Typically, 3-5 minor resections were made using vascular magazines without buttressing. Data were obtained from an institutional database and analysed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of reoperation. Number and location of injuries were registered.

resultsIn total, 191 patients were included, 25 were reoperated (13%). In 21 patients, the indication for reoperation was substantial air leak, 3 patients bleeding and 1 patient empyema. Length of stay (LOS) was 21 (11-33) vs. 5 days (3-11), respectively. Only 3 injuries were in the stapler line, 13 within < 2cm and 15 injuries were in another site. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that decreasing DLCO increased risk of reoperation, OR 1.1 (1.03, 1.18, P = 0.005). Resections in only one lobe, compared to resections in multiple lobes, were also a risk factor OR 3.10 (1.17, 9.32, P = 0.03). Patients undergoing reoperation had significantly increased 30-day mortality, OR 5.52 (1.03, 26.69, P = 0.02).

conclusionsOur incidence of reoperation after LVRS was 13% leading to prolonged LOS and increased 30-day mortality. Low DLCO and resections in a single lobe were significant predictors of reoperation. The air leak was usually not localized in the stapler line.

Indexed as

PneumonectomyPulmonary EmphysemaHumansReoperationSecond-Look SurgeryTreatment OutcomeCOPDLung volume reduction surgeryProlonged air leakReoperationRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38017156
PMCPMC10830766
OpenAlexW4389080414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.