ArticleScientific reports2023
A novel RF-CEEMD-LSTM model for predicting water pollution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating physics informed neural networks for water contamination risk prediction and environmental sustainability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transforming Prediction into Decision: Leveraging Transformer-Long Short-Term Memory Networks and Automatic Control for Enhanced Water Treatment Efficiency and Sustainability.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine learning enhanced grey box soft sensor for melt viscosity prediction in polymer extrusion processes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- STGATN: A novel spatiotemporal graph attention network for predicting pollutant concentrations at multiple stations.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate water pollution prediction is an important basis for water environment prevention and control. The uncertainty of input variables and the nonstationary and nonlinear characteristics of water pollution series hinder the accuracy and reliability of water pollution prediction. This study proposed a novel water pollution prediction model (RF-CEEMD-LSTM) to improve the performance of water pollution prediction by combining advantages of the random forest (RF) and Long short-term memory (LSTM) models and Complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition (CEEMD). The experimental results based on measured data show that the proposed RF-CEEMD-LSTM model can accurately predict water pollution trends, with a mean ab-solute percentage error (MAPE) of less than 8%. The RMSE of the RF-CEEMD-LSTM model is reduced by 62.6%, 39.9%, and 15.5% compared to those of the LSTM, RF-LSTM, and CEEMD-LSTM models, respectively, proving that the proposed method has good advantages in predicting non-linear and nonstationary water pollution sequences. The driving force analysis results showed that TN has the most significant impact on water pollution prediction. The research results could provide references for identifying and explaining water pollution variables and improving water pollution prediction method.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.