ArticleScientific reports2023
GPCR molecular dynamics forecasting using recurrent neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breeding 5.0: Artificial intelligence (AI)-decoded germplasm for accelerated crop innovation.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Article
- Elucidating the Structure and Activation Mechanisms of GPCRs Using Modern Computational and AI Tools.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Accelerating GPCR drug discovery through computation and experiment integrated with direct detection of ligand binding events.npj drug discovery · 2026Review
- Temporally resolved and interpretable machine learning model of GPCR conformational transition.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The Evolving Landscape of Protein Allostery: From Computational and Experimental Perspectives.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Review
- Adversarial training for dynamics matching in coarse-grained models.The Journal of chemical physics · 2025Article
- Recent trends in machine learning and deep learning-based prediction of G-protein coupled receptor-ligand binding affinities.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large superfamily of cell membrane proteins that play an important physiological role as transmitters of extracellular signals. Signal transmission through the cell membrane depends on conformational changes in the transmembrane region of the receptor, which makes the investigation of the dynamics in these regions particularly relevant. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations provide a wealth of data about the structure, dynamics, and physiological function of biological macromolecules by modelling the interactions between their atomic constituents. In this study, a Recurrent and Convolutional Neural Network (RNN) model, namely Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), is used to predict the dynamics of two GPCR states and three specific simulations of each one, through their activation path and focussing on specific receptor regions. Active and inactive states of the GPCRs are analysed in six scenarios involving APO, Full Agonist (BI 167107) and Partial Inverse Agonist (carazolol) of the receptor. Four Machine Learning models with increasing complexity in terms of neural network architecture are evaluated, and their results discussed. The best method achieves an overall RMSD lower than 0.139 Å and the transmembrane helices are the regions showing the minimum prediction errors and minimum relative movements of the protein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.