Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38016992›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2024

Dual-systems models of the genetic architecture of impulsive personality traits: neurogenetic evidence of distinct but related factors.

Alex P Miller, Ian R Gizer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alex P MillerDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9163-8947
Ian R GizerDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4026-5674
University of Missouri · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary Training in Addictions ResearchT32DA015035 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Leopoldo J Cabassa, Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg · 2002 to 2026
$5.3M
Multivariate analyses of polygenic risk for impulsivity and alcohol use: A study of longitudinal trajectories of binge drinking in emerging adulthoodF31AA027957 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI MILLER, ALEX PARKER · 2019 to 2022
$77k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA027957NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA015035NIDA NIH HHS T32DA015035Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDual-systems models, positing an interaction between two distinct and competing systems (i.e. top-down self-control, and bottom-up reward- or emotion-based drive), provide a parsimonious framework for investigating the interplay between cortical and subcortical brain regions relevant to impulsive personality traits (IPTs) and their associations with psychopathology. Despite recent developments in multivariate analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), molecular genetic investigations of these models have not been conducted.

methodsUsing IPT GWAS, we conducted confirmatory genomic structural equation models (GenomicSEM) to empirically evaluate dual-systems models of the genetic architecture of IPTs. Genetic correlations between dual-systems factors and relevant cortical and subcortical neuroimaging phenotypes (regional/structural volume, cortical surface area, cortical thickness) were estimated and compared.

resultsGenomicSEM dual-systems models underscored important sources of shared and unique genetic variance between top-down and bottom-up constructs. Specifically, a dual-systems genomic model consisting of sensation seeking and lack of self-control factors demonstrated distinct but related sources of genetic influences (

conclusionsDual-systems models of the genetic architecture of IPTs tested were consistent with study hypotheses, but associations with relevant neuroimaging phenotypes were mixed (e.g. no associations with subcortical volumes). Findings demonstrate the utility of dual-systems models for studying IPT genetic influences, but also highlight potential limitations as a framework for interpreting IPTs as endophenotypes for psychopathology.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyImpulsive BehaviorPersonalityAdolescentAdultBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingPhenotypeSelf-ControlYoung Adultdual-systems modelsendophenotypegenetic factorsimpulsive personality traitsneurogeneticneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID38016992
PMCPMC11132950
OpenAlexW4389152200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.