Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38016914›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023

Co-administration of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza vaccines in healthcare workers: Results of two vaccination campaigns in a large teaching hospital in Rome.

Domenico Pascucci, Alberto Lontano, Luca Regazzi, Eleonora Marziali, Mario Cesare Nurchis, Matteo Raponi, Giuseppe Vetrugno, Umberto Moscato, Chiara Cadeddu, Patrizia Laurenti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Domenico PascucciHealth Management, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5804-2284
Alberto LontanoDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Luca RegazziDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Eleonora MarzialiDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Mario Cesare NurchisDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Matteo RaponiDepartment of Women, Child and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe VetrugnoHealth Management, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Umberto MoscatoDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Chiara CadedduDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Patrizia LaurentiDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concurrent administration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines has arisen as a promising approach to bolster protection against respiratory pathogens and improve vaccination rates. However, there remains a lack of data regarding the prevalence of co-administration across several vaccination campaigns, especially among healthcare workers (HCWs). Therefore, this study aims to shed light on the acceptance of co-administration strategies among HCWs during the two campaigns following the introduction of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among the HCWs of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, a research hospital in Rome. Hospital administrative databases were accessed to gather information about vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza during the 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 vaccination campaigns. The study included 7399 HCWs. The co-administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 and influenza vaccines presented a significant rise in 2022/2023 compared to the previous vaccination campaign (+38%): this was confirmed for every professional category, with the largest increases among resident doctors (+47%) and physicians (+44%), and also for every age category, but it was particularly evident for the youngest health professionals. The probability of co-administration uptake during the 2022/2023 campaign was significantly higher for males, and for those that received co-administration during the 2021/2022 campaign, while the probability was lower for nurses and administrative staff. This study highlights the co-administration procedure as a valuable and effective tool in annual vaccination campaigns for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza. The procedure's safety and streamlined logistics make it increasingly attractive for implementation, particularly among HCWs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesHealth PersonnelHospitals, TeachingHumansImmunization ProgramsMaleRetrospective StudiesRomeSARS-CoV-2VaccinationInfluenza VaccinesCo-administrationCOVID-19healthcare workersinfluenzaSARS-CoV-2vaccine

Identifiers

PMID38016914
PMCPMC10732597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.