ArticleBMJ open2023
Comparison of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus standard medical therapy on recurrent stroke and mortality rates among patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Stent Angioplasty in Patients with Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Elucidating the benefit of drug-eluting stent for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surgical neurology international · 2025Review
- Clot patterns determined by DSA and CTA can help predict intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in acute ischemic stroke patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStroke remains the second leading cause of death worldwide, a common cause of which is intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). Medical treatment is recommended as first-line therapy for treating ICAS, but the recurrence rate remains high. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has been designed to lower the risk of recurrent stenosis, holding therapeutic promise in the treatment of ICAS. However, the benefits of DCB require further evaluation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols was followed to develop this protocol. We will systematically search online databases including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, China Biological Medicine Database, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP from 1 January 2011 to the date of search. This will be supplemented by a manual search of unpublished and ongoing trials to manually select articles for inclusion. Inclusion criteria are randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials and observational studies that investigated DCB or medical treatment for patients with a symptomatic ICAS of 50%-99%. The primary outcome is short-term composite safety including death of any cause, or non-fatal stroke. Secondary outcomes include long-term death or stroke, restenosis, neurological rehabilitation, quality of life and other complications. The available data will be analysed using meta-analysis, if appropriate. The evaluation of heterogeneity and biases will be guided by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review does not require ethical approval as all available data from eligible studies will be anonymous with no concerns regarding privacy. Our findings will be disseminated through international conferences and peer-reviewed publications. Additional data from the study are available on request to corresponding authors via email. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022341607.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.