Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38016643›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2023

Migratory bats are sensitive to magnetic inclination changes during the compass calibration period.

William T Schneider, Richard A Holland, Oskars Keišs, Oliver Lindecke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Echolocating free-tailed bats use vision and hearing but not magnetoreception when navigating a maze.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Magnetoreception in Cataglyphis hellenica ants.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A perspective on neuroethology: what the past teaches us about the future of neuroethology.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William T SchneiderSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
Richard A HollandSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4495-8061
Oskars KeišsLaboratory of Ornithology, Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, Rīga LV-1004, Latvia.
Oliver LindeckeSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2545-9999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Earth's magnetic field is used as a navigational cue by many animals. For mammals, however, there are few data to show that navigation ability relies on sensing the natural magnetic field. In night-time migrating bats, experiments demonstrating a role for the solar azimuth at sunset in the calibration of the orientation system suggest that the magnetic field is a candidate for their compass. Here, we investigated how an altered magnetic field at sunset changes the nocturnal orientation of the bat

Indexed as

ChiropteraAnimal MigrationAnimalsCalibrationMagnetic FieldsMammalsOrientationSunlightanimal migrationanimal navigationbatsmagnetoreceptionorientationsunset calibration

Identifiers

PMID38016643
PMCPMC10684344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.