Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38016425›Full record

Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2023

[Evaluation of the quality of anesthetic recovery in postoperative patients].

Laura Mariana Navarro-Benítez, Lucero Dalila García-Posada, Isette Yunue Landeros-Navarro, Víctor Manuel López-Garcés

Abstract readEnglish AbstractObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura Mariana Navarro-BenítezInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Bajío, Hospital de Especialidades No. 1, Servicio de Anestesiología. León, Guanajuato, México.ORCID 0000-0002-8005-4265
Lucero Dalila García-PosadaInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Bajío, Hospital de Especialidades No. 1, Servicio de Anestesiología. León, Guanajuato, México.ORCID 0000-0002-0062-2497
Isette Yunue Landeros-NavarroInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Bajío, Hospital de Especialidades No. 1, Servicio de Anestesiología. León, Guanajuato, México.ORCID 0000-0002-8970-843X
Víctor Manuel López-GarcésSecretaría de Salud, Hospital General de León, Servicio de Anestesiología. León, Guanajuato, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0597-953X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive health care includes the evaluation of satisfaction in patient care and the quality of medical services. High-precision instruments have been used to assess the quality of recovery after anesthesia (QoR), such as the QoR-15 questionnaire, a validated and accurate assessment tool that considers aspects of emotionality, physical and psychological well-being, pain, and autonomy. Objective: To assess QoR in postoperative patients who underwent anesthesia. Material and methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study, carried out from March to August 2022. 80 patients from 18 to 70 years who underwent an anesthetic procedure and to which the anesthetic quality QoR-15 questionnaire was administered 24 hours after surgery were included. Descriptive statistics were performed according to the Shapiro-Wilk test. For quantitative variables it was used Mann-Whitney U, and for qualitative variables chi-squared; it was considered significant a value of p < 0.05. Results: The 80 patients obtained a QoR-15 score of 122.06 (52-147), and their QoR was considered good. Anesthetic recovery quality in patients undergoing regional anesthetic techniques was excellent in 42.5% and 10% had balanced general anesthesia, p = 0.011. Conclusions: QoR was higher with regional anesthetic techniques. Quality assessment through validated tools allows objective evaluation and monitoring of the care process in medical services.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnestheticsAnesthesia Recovery PeriodCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAnestheticsAnestesia GeneralAnestesia RegionalAnesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, GeneralCalidad de la Atención de SaludPatient SatisfactionQuality of HealthcareRecoveryRecuperaciónSatisfacción del Paciente

Identifiers

PMID38016425
PMCPMC11967750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.