Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2023
[Barrett's esophagus: histochemical difference between goblet cells and blue cells].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the replacement of the usual esophageal mucosa by a simple columnar epithelium with the presence of goblet cells (GC) of intestinal type. It has been related to different risk factors such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), inappropriate consumption of irritating foods, smoking and overweight. There are CC mimic cells, known as blue cells (BC), which make the diagnosis of BE difficult, due to the lack of a precise definition of the nature and location of the gastroesophageal junction and the microscopic variations in this area. Objective: To identify morphologically and with histochemical techniques Alcian blue (AA) and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) between GC and BC. Material and methods: Retrolective cross-sectional analytical study where 45 samples of patients diagnosed with BE were included. Results: The morphological characteristics are similar in both cell varieties. PAS staining was 100%, unlike AA staining, with only 16 cases with staining, corresponding to 35.55%. Conclusions: PAS staining has a high sensitivity and specificity for the identification of GC, this being a fundamental pillar for the correct diagnosis of BE. The presence of BC detected by AA does not exclude the diagnosis of BE, since both cell types can coexist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38016098PMC10781427W4389152643What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.