ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2023
Graph Neural Networks and Structural Information on Ionic Liquids: A Cheminformatics Study on Molecular Physicochemical Property Prediction.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of physicochemical properties of organic compounds using degree-based topological indices and machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring Chemoinformatics Aspects of Few-Shot Meta-Learning by Example of an Infinite Dilution Activity Coefficient in Ionic Liquid Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- High-Conductivity Electrolytes Screened Using Fragment- and Composition-Aware Deep Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- From Molecules to Medicines: The Role of AI-Driven Drug Discovery Against Alzheimer's Disease and Other Neurological Disorders.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in the Modeling of Ionic Liquids Using Artificial Neural Networks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ionic liquids (ILs) provide a promising solution in many industrial applications, such as solvents, absorbents, electrolytes, catalysts, lubricants, and many others. However, due to the enormous variety of their structures, uncovering or designing those with optimal attributes requires expensive and exhaustive simulations and experiments. For these reasons, searching for an efficient theoretical tool for finding the relationship between the IL structure and properties has been the subject of many research studies. Recently, special attention has been paid to machine learning tools, especially multilayer perceptron and convolutional neural networks, among many other algorithms in the field of artificial neural networks. For the latter, graph neural networks (GNNs) seem to be a powerful cheminformatic tool yet not well enough studied for dual molecular systems such as ILs. In this work, the usage of GNNs in structure-property studies is critically evaluated for predicting the density, viscosity, and surface tension of ILs. The problem of data availability and integrity is discussed to show how well GNNs deal with mislabeled chemical data. Providing more training data is proven to be more important than ensuring that they are immaculate. Great attention is paid to how GNNs process different ions to give graph transformations and electrostatic information. Clues on how GNNs should be applied to predict the properties of ILs are provided. Differences, especially regarding handling mislabeled data, favoring the use of GNNs over classical quantitative structure-property models are discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.