Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38015965›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Modeling intrinsic factors of inclusive engagement in citizen science: Insights from the participants' survey analysis of CSI-COP.

Shlomit Hadad, Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet, Huma Shah, Dorottya Rigler, Ulrico Celentano, Henna Tiensuu, Juha Röning, Jordi Vallverdú, Eva Jove Csabella, Olga Stepankova and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Shlomit HadadDepartment of Digital Learning Technologies, The Israel Academic College in Ramat-Gan, Raanana, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2099-3217
Maayan Zhitomirsky-GeffetDepartment of Information Science, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Huma ShahDepartment of Computational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Dorottya RiglerIndependent Researcher, Hungary.
Ulrico CelentanoBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Henna TiensuuBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Juha RöningBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9993-8602
Jordi VallverdúPhilosophy Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9975-7780
Eva Jove CsabellaPhilosophy Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Olga StepankovaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Assistive Technology, Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, The Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
John GialelisElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Konstantina LantavouElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Tiberius IgnatImmer Besser GmbH and SKS Knowledge Services, Munich, Germany.
Giacomo MasoneDepartment of Computational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Jaimz WinterDepartment of Computational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Marica DumitrascoDepartment of Science and Innovation Management Academy of Music, Theatre and Fine Arts, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova.ORCID 0000-0001-6088-4424

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inclusive citizen science, an emerging field, has seen extensive research. Prior studies primarily concentrated on creating theoretical models and practical strategies for diversifying citizen science (CS) projects. These studies relied on ethical frameworks or post-project empirical observations. Few examined active participants' socio-demographic and behavioral data. Notably, none, to our knowledge, explored prospective citizen scientists' traits as intrinsic factors to enhance diversity and engagement in CS. This paper presents a new inclusive CS engagement model based on quantitative analysis of surveys administered to 540 participants of the dedicated free informal education MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) 'Your Right to Privacy Online' from eight countries in the EU funded project, CSI-COP (Citizen Scientists Investigating Cookies and App GDPR compliance). The surveys were filled out just after completing the training stage and before joining the project as active CSs. Out of the 540 participants who completed the surveys analyzed in this study, only 170 (32%) individuals actively participated as CSs in the project. Therefore, the study attempted to understand what characterizes these participants compared to those who decided to refrain from joining the project after the training stage. The study employed descriptive analysis and advanced statistical tests to explore the correlations among different research variables. The findings revealed several important relationships and predictors for becoming a citizen scientist based on the surveys analysis, such as age, gender, culture, education, Internet accessibility and apps usage, as well as the satisfaction with the MOOC, the mode of training and initial intentions for becoming a CS. These findings lead to the development of the empirical model for inclusive engagement in CS and enhance the understanding of the internal factors that influence individuals' intention and actual participation as CSs. The devised model offers valuable insights and key implications for future CS initiatives. It emphasizes the necessity of targeted recruitment strategies, focusing on underrepresented groups and overcoming accessibility barriers. Positive learning experiences, especially through MOOCs, are crucial; enhancing training programs and making educational materials accessible and culturally diverse can boost participant motivation. Acknowledging varying technological proficiency and providing necessary resources enhances active engagement. Addressing the intention-engagement gap is vital; understanding underlying factors and creating supportive environments can transform intentions into active involvement. Embracing cultural diversity through language-specific strategies ensures an inclusive environment for effective contributions.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceEducational StatusHumansIntrinsic FactorLearningMotivationProspective StudiesIntrinsic Factor

Identifiers

PMID38015965
PMCPMC10684079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.