ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2023
Overview of DrugProt task at BioCreative VII: data and methods for large-scale text mining and knowledge graph generation of heterogenous chemical-protein relations.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- What Do Biomedical NER and Entity Linking Benchmarks Measure? A Corpus-Centric Diagnostic Framework.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Article
- Application and Prospects of Large Language Models in Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Enhancing biomedical relation extraction with directionality.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- LSD600: the first corpus of biomedical abstracts annotated with lifestyle-disease relations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- Leveraging Large Language Models for Real-World Data Evidence: A Framework for Automated Treatment Extraction and Data Harmonization.Journal of registry management · 2025Article
- BioGSF: a graph-driven semantic feature integration framework for biomedical relation extraction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Lifestyle factors in the biomedical literature: an ontology and comprehensive resources for named entity recognition.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- RegulaTome: a corpus of typed, directed, and signed relations between biomedical entities in the scientific literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- EnzChemRED, a rich enzyme chemistry relation extraction dataset.Scientific data · 2024Article
- STRING-ing together protein complexes: corpus and methods for extracting physical protein interactions from the biomedical literature.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Improving dictionary-based named entity recognition with deep learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- The biomedical relationship corpus of the BioRED track at the BioCreative VIII challenge and workshop.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- The overview of the BioRED (Biomedical Relation Extraction Dataset) track at BioCreative VIII.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Towards discovery: an end-to-end system for uncovering novel biomedical relations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- DUVEL: an active-learning annotated biomedical corpus for the recognition of oligogenic combinations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Mining drug-target interactions from biomedical literature using chemical and gene descriptions-based ensemble transformer model.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- CoNECo: a Corpus for Named Entity recognition and normalization of protein Complexes.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is getting increasingly challenging to efficiently exploit drug-related information described in the growing amount of scientific literature. Indeed, for drug-gene/protein interactions, the challenge is even bigger, considering the scattered information sources and types of interactions. However, their systematic, large-scale exploitation is key for developing tools, impacting knowledge fields as diverse as drug design or metabolic pathway research. Previous efforts in the extraction of drug-gene/protein interactions from the literature did not address these scalability and granularity issues. To tackle them, we have organized the DrugProt track at BioCreative VII. In the context of the track, we have released the DrugProt Gold Standard corpus, a collection of 5000 PubMed abstracts, manually annotated with granular drug-gene/protein interactions. We have proposed a novel large-scale track to evaluate the capacity of natural language processing systems to scale to the range of millions of documents, and generate with their predictions a silver standard knowledge graph of 53 993 602 nodes and 19 367 406 edges. Its use exceeds the shared task and points toward pharmacological and biological applications such as drug discovery or continuous database curation. Finally, we have created a persistent evaluation scenario on CodaLab to continuously evaluate new relation extraction systems that may arise. Thirty teams from four continents, which involved 110 people, sent 107 submission runs for the Main DrugProt track, and nine teams submitted 21 runs for the Large Scale DrugProt track. Most participants implemented deep learning approaches based on pretrained transformer-like language models (LMs) such as BERT or BioBERT, reaching precision and recall values as high as 0.9167 and 0.9542 for some relation types. Finally, some initial explorations of the applicability of the knowledge graph have shown its potential to explore the chemical-protein relations described in the literature, or chemical compound-enzyme interactions. Database URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4955410.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.