ArticlePloS one2023
Automated cell counting for Trypan blue-stained cell cultures using machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of an automated total and viable cell counting for GMP-compliant production of human bone marrow stromal cells.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Protocol for constructing an orthotopic mouse model of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Inducible CRISPR-Cas9 screening platform to interrogate non-proliferative cellular states.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Enhanced precision in cell culture analytics: leveraging artificial intelligence for unbiased and non-destructive assessment of cell growth and viability.Cell death discovery · 2026Article
- Response surface optimization of sedimentation efficiency for sustainable green microalgae harvesting using automated non-invasive methods.Microbial cell factories · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Shear Deformation Cytometry Based on Numerical Simulation Method.Biosensors · 2025Article
- An Overview of the Current State of Cell Viability Assessment Methods Using OECD Classification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- PCP Auto Count: A Novel Fiji/ImageJ plug-in for automated quantification of planar cell polarity and cell counting.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- PCP auto count: a novel Fiji/ImageJ plug-in for automated quantification of planar cell polarity and cell counting.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Automated cell counting for Trypan blue-stained cell cultures using machine learning.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell counting is a vital practice in the maintenance and manipulation of cell cultures. It is a crucial aspect of assessing cell viability and determining proliferation rates, which are integral to maintaining the health and functionality of a culture. Additionally, it is critical for establishing the time of infection in bioreactors and monitoring cell culture response to targeted infection over time. However, when cell counting is performed manually, the time involved can become substantial, particularly when multiple cultures need to be handled in parallel. Automated cell counters, which enable significant time reduction, are commercially available but remain relatively expensive. Here, we present a machine learning (ML) model based on YOLOv4 that is able to perform cell counts with a high accuracy (>95%) for Trypan blue-stained insect cells. Images of two distinctly different cell lines, Trichoplusia ni (High FiveTM; Hi5 cells) and Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9), were used for training, validation, and testing of the model. The ML model yielded F1 scores of 0.97 and 0.96 for alive and dead cells, respectively, which represents a substantially improved performance over that of other cell counters. Furthermore, the ML model is versatile, as an F1 score of 0.96 was also obtained on images of Trypan blue-stained human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells that the model had not been trained on. Our implementation of the ML model comes with a straightforward user interface and can image in batches, which makes it highly suitable for the evaluation of multiple parallel cultures (e.g. in Design of Experiments). Overall, this approach for accurate classification of cells provides a fast, bias-free alternative to manual counting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.