Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38015809›Full record

ArticleDemography2023

Research Note Showing That the Rural Mortality Penalty Varies by Region, Race, and Ethnicity in the United States, 1999-2016.

Danielle Rhubart, Alexis Santos

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identifying air quality monitoring deserts in the United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Evolution of the US nonmetropolitan mortality disadvantage by sex, state, and year, 1999-2019.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle RhubartDepartment of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-5104
Alexis SantosDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8437-4493
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Population Research InstituteR24HD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI LANDALE, NANCY S · 2001 to 2016
$9.7M
The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Brian Thiede · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Interdisciplinary Network on Rural Population Health and AgingR24AG065159 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI JENSEN, LEIF · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
The impact of Medicaid expansion on the rural mortality penalty in the United StatesR21AG083393 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI SANTOS-LOZADA, ALEXIS R · 2023 to 2024
$588k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG083393NIA NIH HHS R24 AG065159NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research note presents a new perspective on the rural mortality penalty in the United States. While previous work has documented a growing rural mortality penalty, there has been a lack of attention to heterogeneity in trends at the intersection of region, race, and ethnicity. We use age-adjusted mortality rates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to examine the rural mortality penalty by region, race, and ethnicity for 1999-2016 (N = 44,792,050 deaths) and stratify by 2006 National Center for Health Statistics metropolitan-nonmetropolitan classifications. We find substantial variation at the intersection of region, race, and ethnicity, revealing heterogeneity in the rural penalty and-in some cases-a rural mortality advantage. For the Black/African American population, the rural mortality penalty is observed only in the South. On the other hand, for Hispanic/Latino populations, a small but persistent rural mortality penalty is present only in the South and the West. There is a rural mortality penalty in all regions for White and American Indian/Alaska Native populations. However, for the latter, there is substantial variation in the magnitude of the penalty by region of residence. This research documents heterogeneous patterns when the rural mortality penalty is analyzed by region, race, and ethnicity in the United States.

Indexed as

EthnicityMortalityRacial GroupsRural PopulationBlack or African AmericanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Hispanic or LatinoHumansUnited StatesEthnicityMortalityRaceRegionRural mortality penalty

Identifiers

PMID38015809
PMCPMC10796192
OpenAlexW4389079511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.