Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38015600›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Scoping the Priorities and Concerns of Parents: Infodemiology Study of Posts on Mumsnet and Reddit.

Christopher Thornton, Kate Lanyi, Georgina Wilkins, Rhiannon Potter, Emily Hunter, Niina Kolehmainen, Fiona Pearson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher ThorntonNational Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0055-5500
Kate LanyiNational Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3258-7286
Georgina WilkinsNational Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8800-3596
Rhiannon PotterNational Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0000-4316-250X
Emily HunterNational Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9488-350X
Niina KolehmainenNational Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9229-9913
Fiona PearsonNational Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1626-0862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth technology innovation is increasingly supported by a bottom-up approach to priority setting, aiming to better reflect the concerns of its intended beneficiaries. Web-based forums provide parents with an outlet to share concerns, advice, and information related to parenting and the health and well-being of their children. They provide a rich source of data on parenting concerns and priorities that could inform future child health research and innovation.

objectiveThe aim of the study is to identify common concerns expressed on 2 major web-based forums and cluster these to identify potential family health concern topics as indicative priority areas for future research and innovation.

methodsWe text-mined the r/Parenting subreddit (69,846 posts) and the parenting section of Mumsnet (99,848 posts) to create a large corpus of posts. A generative statistical model (latent Dirichlet allocation) was used to identify the most discussed topics in the corpus, and content analysis was applied to identify the parenting concerns found in a subset of posts.

resultsA model with 25 topics produced the highest coherence and a wide range of meaningful parenting concern topics. The most frequently expressed parenting concerns are related to their child's sleep, self-care, eating (and food), behavior, childcare context, and the parental context including parental conflict. Topics directly associated with infants, such as potty training and bottle feeding, were more common on Mumsnet, while parental context and screen time were more common on r/Parenting.

conclusionsLatent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling can be applied to gain a rapid, yet meaningful overview of parent concerns expressed on a large and diverse set of social media posts and used to complement traditional insight gathering methods. Parents framed their concerns in terms of children's everyday health concerns, generating topics that overlap significantly with established family health concern topics. We provide evidence of the range of family health concerns found at these sources and hope this can be used to generate material for use alongside traditional insight gathering methods.

Indexed as

InfodemiologyParentsChildChild HealthFoodHumansInfantParentingbehaviorchildchildhoodchildrendatadata miningfamily healthinfantinfodemiologyparentparentingRedditsocial mediatoddlertopic modelingweb-based forumwell-being

Identifiers

PMID38015600
PMCPMC10716753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.