Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38015409›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2024

Evidence for a multidimensional account of cognitive and affective theory of mind: A state-trace analysis.

Amy L Jarvis, Hannah A D Keage, Stephanie Wong, Michael Weightman, Rachel G Stephens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Affective Theory of Mind and linguistic intimacy in irony production: a developmental perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Social Cognition in Suicidal Behavior in Psychosis: A Systematic Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy L JarvisJustice and Society Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. amy.jarvis@mymail.unisa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8980-2805
Hannah A D KeageJustice and Society Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-4997
Stephanie WongJustice and Society Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0990-5039
Michael WeightmanFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8451-2529
Rachel G StephensSchool of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2772-5728

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory of mind (ToM) has been argued to be a multidimensional construct, with ToM inferences depending on distinct processes across affective and cognitive ToM tasks and across first-order cognitive and second-order cognitive ToM tasks. Behavioural evidence for a multidimensional account has primarily depended on dissociations identified via analysis of variance, a statistical approach insufficient for assessing dimensionality. Instead, state-trace analysis (STA) is a more appropriate statistical technique to uncover dimensionality. The current study first applied STA to two summary datasets that had previously identified key dissociations between cognitive and affective ToM; these reanalyses did not support a multidimensional account of ToM. Next, STA was applied to a more detailed dataset to reveal whether ToM is based on multiple processes in a sample of 115 older adults aged 60-85 years (M = 68.5, SD = 5.92, 61.7% female) with higher or lower emotion perception ability. Participants made ToM judgements about different social exchanges (e.g., sarcasm or lying). STA results supported a multidimensional account of ToM across first-order cognitive, second-order cognitive, and affective ToM subdomains. These results lay a more rigorous foundation for subsequent studies to further examine the dimensionality of ToM and to apply formal modelling, progressing the field's understanding and measurement of the cognitive processes driving ToM judgements.

Indexed as

CognitionTheory of MindAffectAgedEmotionsFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleNeuropsychological TestsAffectiveEmotionSocial cognitionState-trace analysisTheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID38015409
PMCPMC11021350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.