ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2023
Retrospective study of sacral neuromodulator implantations in a French hospital center: Lifespan and hospital costs assessment.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient experience with sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence - a multi-centre, longitudinal cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSacral nerve neuromodulation (SNM) is a safe and effective therapy for the management of fecal and/or urinary incontinence. The generators InterStim™ and InterStim™ II (Medtronic™) are non-rechargeable active implantable medical devices with a limited lifespan. The aims of this study were to assess the generators' median lifespan for all indications and the long-term hospital costs of the therapy.
methodsThis was a retrospective monocentric study that included 215 patients aged over 18 years who were treated by SNM for fecal incontinence and/or urinary incontinence. Lifespan was considered as the amount of time between definitive implantation and observed battery depletion by the surgeon and was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Costs were assessed according to the activity-based pricing of the French public health care system.
resultsThe median observed lifetime of stimulators implanted in our center was 7.29 years and 5.9 years for InterStim™ and InterStim™ II, respectively. The difference observed between the two generations was statistically significant. The modelling of primary implantation and renewal costs allowed us to observe that the decrease in the lifetime of Interstim™ II is associated with an increase in hospital costs over time. The retrospective study design is one limitation and we did not take into consideration stimulation's settings.
conclusionsThe InterStim™ II lifespan is shorter than the first-generation device. This is associated with an increase of the long-term hospital costs. Additional information about the new neuromodulator will be required to choose the most appropriate IPG for the patient while optimizing the costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.