Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38015211›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2023

Advancing nutrition science to meet evolving global health needs.

Lynnette M Neufeld, Emily Ho, Rima Obeid, Charalampos Tzoulis, Marina Green, Luke G Huber, Michelle Stout, James C Griffiths

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The use of choline supplementation in premature newborns: a systematic review.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Impact ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Lynnette M NeufeldFood and Nutrition Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2652-9108
Emily HoLinus Pauling Institute and College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Rima ObeidDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital of the Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
Charalampos TzoulisDepartment of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Marina GreenNutrition Research Centre Ireland, South East Technological University, Waterford, Ireland.
Luke G HuberCouncil for Responsible Nutrition, Washington, DC, USA.
Michelle StoutAmway/Nutrilite, Buena Park, CA, USA.
James C GriffithsCouncil for Responsible Nutrition-International, Washington, DC, USA. jgriffiths@crnusa.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1947-2828
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine · USAmway (United States) · USFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · ITHaukeland University Hospital · NOOregon State University · USSaarland University · DESouth East Technological University · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Populations in crisis!A global overview of health challenges and policy efforts within the scope of current nutrition issues, from persistent forms of undernutrition, including micronutrient deficiency, to diet-related chronic diseases. Nutrition science has evolved from a therapeutic and prevention emphasis to include a focus on diets and food systems. Working and consensus definitions are needed, as well as guidance related to healthy diets and the emerging issues that require further research and consensus building. Between nutrient deficiency and chronic disease, nutrition has evolved from focusing exclusively on the extremes of overt nutrient deficiency and chronic disease prevention, to equipping bodies with the ability to cope with physiologic, metabolic, and psychological stress. Just what is 'optimal nutrition', is that a valid public health goal, and what terminology is being provided by the nutrition science community? Nutrition research on 'healthspan', resilience, and intrinsic capacity may provide evidence to support optimal nutrition. Finally, experts provide views on ongoing challenges of achieving consensus or acceptance of the various definitions and interventions for health promotion, and how these can inform government health policies.Nutrition topics that receive particular focus in these proceedings include choline, NAD-replenishment in neurodegenerative diseases, and xanthophyll carotenoids. Choline is a crucial nutrient essential for cellular metabolism, requiring consumption from foods or supplements due to inadequate endogenous synthesis. Maternal choline intake is vital for fetal and infant development to prevent neural tube defects. Neurodegenerative diseases pose a growing health challenge, lacking effective therapies. Nutrition, including NAD-replenishing nutrients, might aid prevention. Emerging research indicates xanthophyll carotenoids enhance vision and cognition, potentially impacting age-related diseases.

Indexed as

Neurodegenerative DiseasesNutritional SciencesChildCholineChronic DiseaseDietary SupplementsGlobal HealthHumansInfantNADXanthophyllsCholineNADXanthophyllsCholineNAD-replenishmentNutritionOmega-3 fatty acidsPublic healthXanthophyll carotenoids

Identifiers

PMID38015211
PMCPMC10684707
OpenAlexW4389082346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.